ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2021
A meta-analysis of Alzheimer's disease's relationship with human ApoE gene variants.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of apolipoprotein E variants on Alzheimer's disease in Latin America: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review: fluid biomarkers and machine learning methods to improve the diagnosis from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Three-dimensional interactive network: Mitochondrial-metabolic-calcium homeostasis driving Alzheimer's disease.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Clinical and neuropsychological profile of Alzheimer's disease in Tunisia and the impact ofFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Revealing third-order interactions through the integration of machine learning and entropy methods in genomic studies.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Hippocampal Volume and Episodic Associative Memory Identify Memory Risk in Subjective Cognitive Decline Individuals in the CIMA-Q Cohort, Regardless of Cognitive Reserve Level and APOE4 Status.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
- Genetic and Molecular Evaluation ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the association between Alzheimer's disease and apolipoprotein E (ApoE). Studies on this relationship are plentiful, but they mostly suffer from the disadvantage of inadequate sample size, so we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the association between ApoE polymorphisms and AD in humans.
methodThe research literature centered on the association between Alzheimer's disease and ApoE polymorphisms was searched using databases including EMBASE, CQVIP, Medline, Web of knowledge, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data up to July 2020. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the NOS scale. We used RevMan 5.3 statistical software for the data extraction and meta-analysis.
resultsA total of 569 studies were retrieved according to the search strategy and the inclusion criteria. After removing the duplicate studies and studies that did not match the topic, 155 studies were obtained. 39 publications were finally included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Five of them were selected for the meta-analysis after a careful evaluation.
conclusionPatients with Alzheimer's disease have a high positive rate of the ε4 allele (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.38-3.48) and a low positive rate of the ε3 allele, but there is no significant association between the ApoE ε2 allele and AD (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.19-2.58). The positivity rates of the ε4/ε4 and ε3/ε4 genotypes were higher in the case group (OR = 3.82, 95% CI: 1.86-7.84; OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.40-3.06), but the positivity rates of the ε2/ε3 and ε3/ε3 genotypes were significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.18-2.11; OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.75).
Indexed as
Identifiers
34650676PMC8507054W3207019463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.