ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Diagnostic value and significance of serum miR-132 combined with miR-223 for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MicroRNAs as regulators of cardiac dysfunction in sepsis: pathogenesis and diagnostic potential.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical effectiveness of sivelestat in treating sepsis patients with both acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Trial
- Quercetin ameliorates ferroptosis of rat cardiomyocytes via activation of the SIRT1/p53/SLC7A11 signaling pathway to alleviate sepsis‑induced cardiomyopathy.International journal of molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Modes of action and diagnostic value of miRNAs in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In previous studies, miR-132 and miR-223 were considered to be involved in cellular and pathological processes of diseases. However, the role of early diagnosis and prognosis evaluation in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) remains unknown. The present study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of combined detection of miR-132 and miR-223 for SIC and their correlation with creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL)-6. SIC patients (n=80) admitted to Tianjin Medical University General Hospital were assigned to the research group (RG), while 60 healthy participants receiving physical examinations at the same period were assigned to the control group (CG). Serum expression profiles of miR-132 and miR-223 were detected by the RT-qPCR. CK-MB and cTnI were assessed using chemiluminescence assay, and TNF-α and IL-6 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serum miR-132 and miR-223 levels were significantly lower in the RG than in the CG (P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of SIC were 82.50 and 71.67% for miR-132, 95.00 and 61.67% for miR-223, as well as 86.25 and 86.67% for miR-132 combined with miR-223. Serum miR-132 and miR-223 levels were significantly higher in the survivor group than in the deceased group (P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for the prognosis of SIC were 85.96 and 65.22% for miR-132 combined with miR-223. Serum miR-132 and miR-223 were negatively correlated with serum CK-MB, cTnI, TNF-α, and IL-6 (P<0.001). miR-132 combined with miR-223 can be used for early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of SIC, and the two are correlated with CK-MB, cTnI, TNF-α, and IL-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.