Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34650524›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2021

Lactic Acid Bacteria - A Promising Tool for Controlling Chicken

Agnieszka Krystyna Wyszyńska, Renata Godlewska

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lactic Acid Bacteria Bacteriocins: Safe and Effective Antimicrobial Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. In vitro probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of Muscovy ducks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Campylobacter in Africa - A specific viewpoint.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2023
    Review
  14. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of the ProbioticLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agnieszka Krystyna WyszyńskaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Renata GodlewskaDepartment of Bacterial Genetics, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2005, campylobacteriosis has been the most common zoonotic disease in Europe. The main reservoir of pathogenic

Indexed as

Campylobacterlactic acid bacteriamicrobiomepoultryprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID34650524
PMCPMC8506037
OpenAlexW3203534716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.