ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021
End-of-Life Care Decision-Making in Stroke.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of death and end-of-life care among stroke patients: A comparative study of Mexican American and non-hispanic white surrogate decision makers.Equity neuroscience · 2025Article
- Advance care planning among stroke patients: A scoping review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Review
- Use of End-of-Life Care Pathways in Hospitalized Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Study of the AMBER Care and Dying Adults in the Last Days of Life Approaches.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Timing of neuroprognostication in the ICU.Current opinion in critical care · 2025Review
- Experiences and needs of older patients with stroke in China involved in rehabilitation decision-making: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- End-of-Life Care of a Patient With Pontine Stroke and Prolonged Hospitalization: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Recent Trends in the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease : 2017-2021.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2024Article
- End-of-life decisions and involvement of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Physicians in Europe.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- A case for preference-sensitive decision timelines to aid shared decision-making in intensive care: need and possible application.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Prudence in end-of-life decision making: A virtue-based analysis of physician communication with patients and surrogates.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
- Designing for patient decision-making: Design challenges generated by patients with atrial fibrillation during evaluation of a decision aid prototype.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Medical management of cerebral edema in large hemispheric infarcts.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and long-term disability in the United States. Though advances in interventions have improved patient survival after stroke, prognostication of long-term functional outcomes remains challenging, thereby complicating discussions of treatment goals. Stroke patients who require intensive care unit care often do not have the capacity themselves to participate in decision making processes, a fact that further complicates potential end-of-life care discussions after the immediate post-stroke period. Establishing clear, consistent communication with surrogates through shared decision-making represents best practice, as these surrogates face decisions regarding artificial nutrition, tracheostomy, code status changes, and withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapies. Throughout decision-making, clinicians must be aware of a myriad of factors affecting both provider recommendations and surrogate concerns, such as cognitive biases. While decision aids have the potential to better frame these conversations within intensive care units, aids specific to goals-of-care decisions for stroke patients are currently lacking. This mini review highlights the difficulties in decision-making for critically ill ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage patients, beginning with limitations in current validated clinical scales and clinician subjectivity in prognostication. We outline processes for identifying patient preferences when possible and make recommendations for collaborating closely with surrogate decision-makers on end-of-life care decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.