Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34650476›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021

Human, All Too Human? An All-Around Appraisal of the "Artificial Intelligence Revolution" in Medical Imaging.

Francesca Coppola, Lorenzo Faggioni, Michela Gabelloni, Fabrizio De Vietro, Vincenzo Mendola, Arrigo Cattabriga, Maria Adriana Cocozza, Giulio Vara, Alberto Piccinino, Silvia Lo Monaco and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. AI in Radiology: Navigating Medical Responsibility.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca CoppolaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenzo FaggioniAcademic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Michela GabelloniAcademic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Fabrizio De VietroAcademic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vincenzo MendolaAcademic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Arrigo CattabrigaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Adriana CocozzaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulio VaraDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alberto PiccininoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia Lo MonacoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Luigi Vincenzo PastoreDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Margherita MottolaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia MalavasiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro BevilacquaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Emanuele NeriSIRM Foundation, Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, Milan, Italy.
Rita GolfieriDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITSocietà Italiana di Reumatologia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has seen dramatic growth over the past decade, evolving from a niche super specialty computer application into a powerful tool which has revolutionized many areas of our professional and daily lives, and the potential of which seems to be still largely untapped. The field of medicine and medical imaging, as one of its various specialties, has gained considerable benefit from AI, including improved diagnostic accuracy and the possibility of predicting individual patient outcomes and options of more personalized treatment. It should be noted that this process can actively support the ongoing development of advanced, highly specific treatment strategies (e.g., target therapies for cancer patients) while enabling faster workflow and more efficient use of healthcare resources. The potential advantages of AI over conventional methods have made it attractive for physicians and other healthcare stakeholders, raising much interest in both the research and the industry communities. However, the fast development of AI has unveiled its potential for disrupting the work of healthcare professionals, spawning concerns among radiologists that, in the future, AI may outperform them, thus damaging their reputations or putting their jobs at risk. Furthermore, this development has raised relevant psychological, ethical, and medico-legal issues which need to be addressed for AI to be considered fully capable of patient management. The aim of this review is to provide a brief, hopefully exhaustive, overview of the state of the art of AI systems regarding medical imaging, with a special focus on how AI and the entire healthcare environment should be prepared to accomplish the goal of a more advanced human-centered world.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecommunicationethicsmedical imagingmedico-legal issuespatient datapsychology

Identifiers

PMID34650476
PMCPMC8505993
OpenAlexW3204768714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.