ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021
Decoding Different Reach-and-Grasp Movements Using Noninvasive Electroencephalogram.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macroscopic EEG reveals discriminative low-frequency oscillations in plan-to-grasp visuomotor tasks.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study of Conventional and Tripolar EEG for High-Performance Reach-to-Grasp BCI Systems.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Dynamic evolution of intracortical and corticomuscular connectivity during reach-and-grasp movement planning and execution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Imagined Movement for Brain-Computer Interface Control: An fNIRS and EEG Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Wavelet Analysis of Noninvasive EEG Signals Discriminates Complex and Natural Grasp Types.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: State of the Art and Trends.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Correlation between the ERD in grasp/open tasks of BCIs and hand function of stroke patients: a cross-sectional study.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Article
- Decoding reach-to-grasp from EEG using classifiers trained with data from the contralateral limb.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Coordinating human-robot collaboration by EEG-based human intention prediction and vigilance control.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- Electroencephalogram Source Imaging and Brain Network Based Natural Grasps Decoding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grasping is one of the most indispensable functions of humans. Decoding reach-and-grasp actions from electroencephalograms (EEGs) is of great significance for the realization of intuitive and natural neuroprosthesis control, and the recovery or reconstruction of hand functions of patients with motor disorders. In this paper, we investigated decoding five different reach-and-grasp movements closely related to daily life using movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs). In the experiment, nine healthy subjects were asked to naturally execute five different reach-and-grasp movements on the designed experimental platform, namely palmar, pinch, push, twist, and plug grasp. A total of 480 trials per subject (80 trials per condition) were recorded. The MRCPs amplitude from low-frequency (0.3-3 Hz) EEG signals were used as decoding features for further offline analysis. Average binary classification accuracy for grasping vs. the no-movement condition peaked at 75.06 ± 6.8%. Peak average accuracy for grasping vs. grasping conditions of 64.95 ± 7.4% could be reached. Grand average peak accuracy of multiclassification for five grasping conditions reached 36.7 ± 6.8% at 1.45 s after the movement onset. The analysis of MRCPs indicated that all the grasping conditions are more pronounced than the no-movement condition, and there are also significant differences between the grasping conditions. These findings clearly proved the feasibility of decoding multiple reach-and-grasp actions from noninvasive EEG signals. This work is significant for the natural and intuitive BCI application, particularly for neuroprosthesis control or developing an active human-machine interaction system, such as rehabilitation robot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.