Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34650220›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Estimation of current and post-treatment retinal function in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy using artificial intelligence.

Maximilian Pfau, Elon H C van Dijk, Thomas J van Rijssen, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Frank G Holz, Monika Fleckenstein, Camiel J F Boon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01797861 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial Comparing Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01797861 phase4completednot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial Comparing Half-dose Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With High-density Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Treatment in Patients With Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2013 to 2017Enrolled140ConditionsChronic Central Serous ChorioretinopathyArmsHalf-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT), Micropulse laser (ML) treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Predictive risk scores for visual prognosis after photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Artificial intelligence in individualized retinal disease management.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maximilian Pfau *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Elon H C van Dijk *Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Thomas J van RijssenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Steffen Schmitz-ValckenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Frank G HolzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Monika FleckensteinJohn A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Utah, USA.
Camiel J F BoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. cjfboon@hotmail.com.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Bonn · DENational Eye Institute · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refined understanding of the association of retinal microstructure with current and future (post-treatment) function in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) may help to identify patients that would benefit most from treatment. In this post-hoc analysis of data from the prospective, randomized PLACE trial (NCT01797861), we aimed to determine the accuracy of AI-based inference of retinal function from retinal morphology in cCSC. Longitudinal spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) data from 57 eyes of 57 patients from baseline, week 6-8 and month 7-8 post-treatment were segmented using deep-learning software. Fundus-controlled perimetry data were aligned to the SD-OCT data to extract layer thickness and reflectivity values for each test point. Point-wise retinal sensitivity could be inferred with a (leave-one-out) cross-validated mean absolute error (MAE) [95% CI] of 2.93 dB [2.40-3.46] (scenario 1) using random forest regression. With addition of patient-specific baseline data (scenario 2), retinal sensitivity at remaining follow-up visits was estimated even more accurately with a MAE of 1.07 dB [1.06-1.08]. In scenario 3, month 7-8 post-treatment retinal sensitivity was predicted from baseline SD-OCT data with a MAE of 3.38 dB [2.82-3.94]. Our study shows that localized retinal sensitivity can be inferred from retinal structure in cCSC using machine-learning. Especially, prediction of month 7-8 post-treatment sensitivity with consideration of the treatment as explanatory variable constitutes an important step toward personalized treatment decisions in cCSC.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdultCentral Serous ChorioretinopathyFemaleFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34650220
PMCPMC8516921
OpenAlexW3206271659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.