Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34650064›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Genomic analysis finds no evidence of canonical eukaryotic DNA processing complexes in a free-living protist.

Dayana E Salas-Leiva, Eelco C Tromer, Bruce A Curtis, Jon Jerlström-Hultqvist, Martin Kolisko, Zhenzhen Yi, Joan S Salas-Leiva, Lucie Gallot-Lavallée, Shelby K Williams, Geert J P L Kops and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Massive intein content inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CryptoCEN: A Co-Expression Network forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Dayana E Salas-LeivaInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. Dayana.Salas@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-3351
Eelco C TromerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-7727
Bruce A CurtisInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-2173
Jon Jerlström-HultqvistInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7992-7970
Martin KoliskoInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Acad. Sci, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0600-1867
Zhenzhen YiGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0693-9989
Joan S Salas-LeivaCONACyT-Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, Departamento de medio ambiente y energía, Miguel de Cervantes 120, Complejo Industrial Chihuahua, 31136, Chihuahua, Chih., México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4141-140X
Lucie Gallot-LavalléeInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6763-3388
Shelby K WilliamsInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-5208
Geert J P L KopsOncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute - KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3555-5295
John M ArchibaldInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7255-780X
Alastair G B SimpsonInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-1709
Andrew J RogerInstitute for Comparative Genomics (ICG), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. Andrew.Roger@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-9820
Dalhousie University · CACentro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados · MXInstitute of Parasitology · CZRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NLSouth China Normal University · CNUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

CIHR FRN-142349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells replicate and segregate their DNA with precision. Previous studies showed that these regulated cell-cycle processes were present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor and that their core molecular parts are conserved across eukaryotes. However, some metamonad parasites have secondarily lost components of the DNA processing and segregation apparatuses. To clarify the evolutionary history of these systems in these unusual eukaryotes, we generated a genome assembly for the free-living metamonad Carpediemonas membranifera and carried out a comparative genomics analysis. Here, we show that parasitic and free-living metamonads harbor an incomplete set of proteins for processing and segregating DNA. Unexpectedly, Carpediemonas species are further streamlined, lacking the origin recognition complex, Cdc6 and most structural kinetochore subunits. Carpediemonas species are thus the first known eukaryotes that appear to lack this suite of conserved complexes, suggesting that they likely rely on yet-to-be-discovered or alternative mechanisms to carry out these fundamental processes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeGenomicsAnimalsDNAEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsMicrobiologyParasitesProteinsDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID34650064
PMCPMC8516963
OpenAlexW3207297233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.