Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34649963›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2023

Implementation and effectiveness of pharmacist-led interviews at patient hospital admission in a rheumatology department.

Anne-Laure Yailian, Laura Biry, Aurélie Fontana, Emmanuelle Vignot, Charline Estublier, Cyrille Confavreux, Christine Pivot, Roland Chapurlat, Humbert de Freminville, Audrey Janoly-Dumenil

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Laure YailianDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France anne-laure.yailian@chu-lyon.fr.
Laura BiryDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Aurélie FontanaDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Emmanuelle VignotDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Charline EstublierINSERM UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Cyrille ConfavreuxINSERM UMR 1033, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Christine PivotDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Roland ChapurlatDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Humbert de FreminvilleEA 4129 Parcours Santé Systémique, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.
Audrey Janoly-DumenilDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedication reconciliation is time-consuming and its complete deployment can be difficult. The implementation of a simplified process, such as patient interviews at admission without full reconciliation, may contribute to improve patient care. The objective of the present study was to describe the feasibility and assess the potential effectiveness of implementing pharmacist-led interviews at patient admission to a rheumatology department.

methodsThis is a prospective observational study of pharmacist-led interviews at patient admission conducted between April 2015 and May 2017 in the 34-bed rheumatology department of Edouard Herriot Hospital, a French university hospital. These interviews were structured to explore patient medication management at home. The main outcome was the number of medication errors at admission. Other outcomes were the total number of interviews, the number of interviews with at least one new item of information provided by the patient, the number of interviews with at least one medication error detected, and the number of interviews leading to a modification of the hospital medication order.

resultsA total of 247 interviews were carried out; there was an increase in the number of interviews over the study period (n=54 in 2015, n=98 in 2016, and n=95 for the first 5 months of 2017). Among the interviews conducted, 135 (55%) provided new information concerning patient medication management and 117 medication errors were identified in hospital orders (0.47/patient). There were 76 interviews (31%) with at least one medication error; all led to a medication order modification.

conclusionsThe study found that pharmacist-led interviews at patient admission were effective in detecting medication errors. They could be an alternative to a full medication reconciliation process in targeted situations. When the patient interview does not provide sufficiently robust information, full medication reconciliation may be performed.

Indexed as

Pharmacy Service, HospitalRheumatologyHospitals, UniversityHumansPatient AdmissionPharmacistsdrug misusehospitalmedication systemspharmacy servicerheumatologysafety

Identifiers

PMID34649963
PMCPMC10447965
OpenAlexW3206031072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.