ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2022
Benefits outweigh the risks: a consensus statement on the risks of physical activity for people living with long-term conditions.
Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Psychosocial Factors in Returning to Physical Activity and Sport Among Female Football Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of rebound exercises on balance and mobility of people with neurological disorders: A systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Proof of Concept of a 6-Month Person-Oriented Exercise Intervention 'MultiPill-Exercise' among Patients at Risk of or with Multiple Chronic Diseases: Results of a One-Group Pilot Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Removing barriers to physical activity for people with long-term conditions: co-creating patient-centred guidance through a multistakeholder consensus approach.British journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Exploration of the Multidimensional Influences on Physical Activity Among People With Arthritis.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Exploring experiences of swimming and aquatic exercise in individuals with long term health conditions: results from Swim England's 'England Swims' survey.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Cardiac abnormalities in a young athlete with severe pectus excavatum: a case report of a diagnostic loop between anatomical distortion and cardiomyopathy.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Physical Activity Among a Diverse Cohort of MSM Living with HIV.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Physical Activity Prescription in Primary Health Care: An Ethical Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Outcomes of older adult physical activity participation that matter to health care professionals.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
- Aerobic Exercise-Induced TGF-β Receptor Reprogramming Disrupts Neutrophil-Microglia Crosstalk to Attenuate Early Brain Injury after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Osteoporosis knowledge and health beliefs in ındividuals with myasthenia gravis: a cross-sectional controlled study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Validation of a single question for assessment of habitual physical activity in women.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definition, development, implementation and outcomes of pre-operative surgery schools.Anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Exercise Communication for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The PACE Trial's GET Manual for Therapists Exposes the Fixed Incremental Nature of Graded Exercise Therapy for ME/CFS.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physical activity promotion and participation for people living with and beyond head and neck cancer: A mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Kickstart patient movement: a 5-step framework for primary care clinicians to support inactive patients in becoming more active.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the usability and acceptability of the P-STEP® mobile app: feasibility study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe benefits of physical activity for people living with long-term conditions (LTCs) are well established. However, the risks of physical activity are less well documented. The fear of exacerbating symptoms and causing adverse events is a persuasive barrier to physical activity in this population.This work aimed to agree clear statements for use by healthcare professionals about medical risks of physical activity for people living with LTCs through expert consensus. These statements addressed the following questions: (1) Is increasing physical activity safe for people living with one or more LTC? (2) Are the symptoms and clinical syndromes associated with common LTCs aggravated in the short or long term by increasing physical activity levels? (3) What specific risks should healthcare professionals consider when advising symptomatic people with one or more LTCs to increase their physical activity levels?
methodsStatements were developed in a multistage process, guided by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool. A patient and clinician involvement process, a rapid literature review and a steering group workshop informed the development of draft symptom and syndrome-based statements. We then tested and refined the draft statements and supporting evidence using a three-stage modified online Delphi study, incorporating a multidisciplinary expert panel with a broad range of clinical specialties.
resultsTwenty-eight experts completed the Delphi process. All statements achieved consensus with a final agreement between 88.5%-96.5%. Five 'impact statements' conclude that (1) for people living with LTCs, the benefits of physical activity far outweigh the risks, (2) despite the risks being very low, perceived risk is high, (3) person-centred conversations are essential for addressing perceived risk, (4) everybody has their own starting point and (5) people should stop and seek medical attention if they experience a dramatic increase in symptoms. In addition, eight symptom/syndrome-based statements discuss specific risks for musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, shortness of breath, cardiac chest pain, palpitations, dysglycaemia, cognitive impairment and falls and frailty.
conclusionClear, consistent messaging on risk across healthcare will improve people living with LTCs confidence to be physically active. Addressing the fear of adverse events on an individual level will help healthcare professionals affect meaningful behavioural change in day-to-day practice. Evidence does not support routine preparticipation medical clearance for people with stable LTCs if they build up gradually from their current level. The need for medical guidance, as opposed to clearance, should be determined by individuals with specific concerns about active symptoms. As part of a system-wide approach, consistent messaging from healthcare professionals around risk will also help reduce cross-sector barriers to engagement for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.