Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34649625›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2021

Supported online cognitive behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Sarah Barakat, Stephen Touyz, Danielle Maloney, Janice Russell, Phillipa Hay, Michelle Cunich, Sharyn Lymer, Marcellinus Kim, Sloane Madden, Jane Miskovic-Wheatley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah BarakatInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney | Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. sarah.barakat@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-8320
Stephen TouyzInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney | Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Danielle MaloneyInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney | Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Janice RussellInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney | Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Phillipa HayTranslational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Michelle CunichCharles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health (Central Clinical School), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sharyn LymerCharles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health (Central Clinical School), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Marcellinus KimSydney Local Health District Mental Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Sloane MaddenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Jane Miskovic-WheatleyInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney | Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah MaguireInsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney | Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

nsw health 61
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the availability of effective treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN), a number of barriers to accessibility exist. Examples include access to trained clinicians, the expense of treatment, geographical limitations, and personal limitations such as stigma regarding help seeking. Self-help interventions, delivered via a digital platform, have the potential to overcome treatment gaps by providing patients with standardised, evidence-based treatments that are easily accessible, cost-effective, and require minimal clinician support. Equally, it is important to examine the shortcomings of digital interventions when compared to traditional to face-to-face delivery (e.g., high dropout rates) in order to maximise the therapeutic effectiveness of online, self-help interventions.

methodsA three-arm, multisite randomised controlled trial will be conducted in Australia examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a newly developed online self-help intervention, Binge Eating eTherapy (BEeT), in a sample of patients with full or sub-threshold BN. The BEeT program consists of 10, multimedia sessions delivering the core components of cognitive behaviour therapy. Eligible participants will be randomised to one of three groups: independent completion of BEeT as a purely self-help program, completion of BEeT alongside clinician support (in the form of weekly telemedicine sessions), or waitlist control. Assessments will take place at baseline, weekly, post-intervention, and three-month follow up. The primary outcome is frequency of objective binge episodes. Secondary outcomes include frequency of other core eating disorder behavioural symptoms and beliefs, psychological distress, and quality of life. Statistical analyses will examine treatment effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability and cost effectiveness. DISCUSSION: There is limited capacity within the mental health workforce in Australia to meet the demand of people seeking treatment for eating disorders. This imbalance has only worsened following outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research is required into innovative digital modes of treatment delivery with the capacity to service mental health needs in an accessible and affordable manner. Self-help programs may also appeal to individuals who are more reluctant to engage in traditional face-to-face treatment formats. This study will provide rigorous evidence on how to diversify treatment options for individuals with BN, ensuring more people with the illness can access evidence-based treatment. The study has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR Registration Number: ACTRN12619000123145p). Registered 22 January 2019, https://www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au/anzctr/trial/ACTRN12619000123145 .

Indexed as

Cognitive behaviour therapyCost-effectivenessCOVID-19 driven demand for online careFeeding and eating disordersOnline healthcareSelf-help treatment

Identifiers

PMID34649625
PMCPMC8515319
OpenAlexW3206964926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.