Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34649581›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

The effects of geographical accessibility to health facilities on antenatal care and delivery services utilization in Benin: a cross-sectional study.

Mariam Tanou, Takaaki Kishida, Yusuke Kamiya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modelling spatial heterogeneity in exposure buffers and risk: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariam TanouMinistry of Infrastructure, Building Lamizana, 03BP7011, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. mariamtanoubf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-1908
Takaaki KishidaGraduate School of International Cooperation Studies, Kobe University, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Yusuke KamiyaFaculty of Economics, Ryukoku University, 67 Tsukamoto-cho, Fukakusa, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-8577, Japan.
Burkina Faso Ministry of the Environment, Green Economy, and Climate Change · BFKobe University · JPRyukoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe world is making progress toward achieving maternal and child health (MCH) related components of the Sustainable Development Goals. Nevertheless, the progress of many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa is lagging. Geographical accessibility from residence to health facilities is considered a major obstacle hampering the use of appropriate MCH services. Benin, a country where the southern and northern parts belong to different geographical zones, has among the highest maternal mortality rate in the world. Adequate use of MCH care is important to save lives of women and their babies. This study assessed the effect of geographical accessibility to health facilities on antenatal care and delivery services utilization in Benin, with an emphasis on geographical zones.

methodsWe pooled two rounds of Benin Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHS). The sample included 18,105 women aged 15-49 years (9111 from BDHS-2011/2012 and 8994 from BDHS-2017/2018) who had live births within five years preceding the surveys. We measured the distance and travel time from residential areas to the closest health center by merging the BDHS datasets with Benin's geographic information system data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect of geographical access on pregnancy and delivery services utilization. We conducted a propensity score-matching analysis to check for robustness.

resultsRegression results showed that the distance to the closest health center had adverse effects on the likelihood of a woman receiving appropriate maternal healthcare. The estimates showed that one km increase in straight-line distance to the closest health center reduces the odds of the woman receiving at least one antenatal care by 0.042, delivering in facility by 0.092, and delivering her baby with assistance of skilled birth attendants by 0.118. We also confirmed the negative effects of travel time and altitude of women's residence on healthcare utilization. Nonetheless, these effects were mainly seen in the northern part of Benin.

conclusionsGeographical accessibility to health facilities is critically important for the utilization of antenatal care and delivery services, particularly in the northern part of Benin. Improving geographical accessibility, especially in rural areas, is significant for further use of maternal health care in Benin.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPrenatal CareBeninCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancyAltitudeAntenatal careBeninDelivery servicesDistanceGeographical accessibilityGeographic Information SystemTravel time

Identifiers

PMID34649581
PMCPMC8518195
OpenAlexW3205825232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.