ArticleBMC oral health2021
STAT1: a novel candidate biomarker and potential therapeutic target of the recurrent aphthous stomatitis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Integrative analysis of CBR1 as a prognostic factor associated with IDH-mutant glioblastoma in the Chinese population.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) frequently affects patient quality of life as a result of long lasting and recurrent episodes of burning pain. However, there were temporarily few available effective medical therapies currently. Drug target identification was the first step in drug discovery, was usually finding the best interaction mode between the potential target candidates and probe small molecules. Therefore, elucidating the molecular mechanism of RAS pathogenesis and exploring the potential molecular targets of medical therapies for RAS was of vital importance.
methodsBioinformatics data mining techniques were applied to explore potential novel targets, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to construct a co-expression module of the gene chip data from GSE37265, and the hub genes were identified by the Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) plugin.
resultsA total of 16 co-expression modules were identified, and 30 hub genes in the turquoise module were identified. In addition, functional analysis of Hub genes in modules of interest was performed, which indicated that such hub genes were mainly involved in pathways related to immune response, virus infection, epithelial cell, signal transduction. Two clusters (highly interconnected regions) were determined in the network, with score = 17.647 and 10, respectively, cluster 1 and cluster 2 are linked by STAT1 and ICAM1, it is speculated that STAT1 may be a primary gene of RAS. Finally, genistein, daidzein, kaempferol, resveratrol, rosmarinic acid, triptolide, quercetin and (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate were selected from the TCMSP database, and both of them is the STAT-1 inhibitor. The results of reverse molecular docking suggest that in addition to triptolide, (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and resveratrol, the other 5 compounds (flavonoids) with similar structures may bind to the same position of STAT1 protein with different docking score.
conclusionsOur study identified STAT1 as the potential biomarkers that might contribute to the diagnosis and potential therapeutic target of RAS, and we can also screen RAS therapeutic drugs from STAT-1 inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.