Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34649538›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study.

Annika Skoogh, Marie Louise Hall-Lord, Carina Bååth, Ann-Kristin Sandin Bojö

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06926504 (TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06926504 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2029Enrolled800,000ConditionsPerson Centered Care, Patient Safety, Patient SatisfactionArmsThe care process S-TeamBirth, S-TeamBirth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annika SkooghDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden. annika.skoogh@kau.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-8833
Marie Louise Hall-LordDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.
Carina BååthDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.
Ann-Kristin Sandin BojöDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, S-651 88, Karlstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildbirth could negatively affect the woman's health through adverse events. To prevent adverse events and increase patient safety it is important to detect and learn from them. The aim of the study was to describe adverse events, including the preventability and severity of harm during planned vaginal births, in women giving birth in the labor ward.

methodsThe study had a descriptive design with a retrospective birth record review to assess the preventability of adverse events using the Swedish version of the Global Trigger Tool. The setting was a labor ward in Sweden with low-risk and risk childbirths. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's Chi-square test and Student's t-test were used.

resultsA total of 38 adverse events (12.2%) were identified in 311 reviewed birth records. Of these, 28 (73.7%) were assessed as preventable. Third- or fourth-degree lacerations and distended urinary bladder were most prevalent together with anesthesia-related adverse events. The majority of the adverse events were classified into the harm categories of 'prolonged hospital care' (63.2%) and 'temporary harm' (31.6%). No permanent harm were identified, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable.

conclusionsThis first study using Global Trigger Tool in a labor ward in Sweden identified a higher incidence of adverse events than previous studies in obstetric care. No permanent patient harm was found, but over two-thirds of the adverse events were assessed as preventable. The results draw particular attention to 3

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricParturitionFemaleHospitalsHumansPatient SafetyPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAdverse eventsChildbirthGlobal trigger toolHarmLaborObstetric carePatient safetyRecord review

Identifiers

PMID34649538
PMCPMC8518258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.