Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34649034›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2021

Changes in social support of pregnant and postnatal mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Judy Zhou, Kathryn L Havens, Catherine P Starnes, Trevor A Pickering, Natalie H Brito, Cassandra L Hendrix, Moriah E Thomason, Tessa C Vatalaro, Beth A Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Judy ZhouDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar St, CHP 155, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, United States. Electronic address: judy.zhou@pt.usc.edu.
Kathryn L HavensDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar St, CHP 155, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, United States.
Catherine P StarnesKnowesis Inc., 8315 Lee Hwy Suite 400, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Trevor A PickeringDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, United States.
Natalie H BritoDepartment of Applied Psychology, New York University, 246 Greene Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10003, United States.
Cassandra L HendrixDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health, 1 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, New York, 10016, United States.
Moriah E ThomasonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health, 1 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, New York, 10016, United States; Department of Population Health, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue New York, New York, 10016, United States.
Tessa C VatalaroDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health, 1 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, New York, 10016, United States.
Beth A SmithDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar St, CHP 155, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States; Division of Research on Children, Youth, and Families, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd Los Angeles, CA, 90027, United States; Developmental Neuroscience and Neurogenetics Program, The Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States.

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
8/24 The Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055338 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Obianuju Berry, Lauren Christine Shuffrey · 2021 to 2026
$9.4M
In Utero Assessment of the Human Neural Connectome and Later Child BehaviorR01MH110793 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2016 to 2021
$2.7M
4:4 Investigation of opioid exposure and neurodevelopment (iOPEN)R34DA050287 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BERGINK, VEERLE, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2019 to 2021
$979k
Biological and Environmental Contributions to Healthy Baby Development in Diverse PopulationR34DA050254 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI LEVITT, PAT · 2019 to 2020
$741k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050287NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055338NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objectives were to assess in perinatal women: the most effective methods used to meet social support needs during COVID-19, the impact of COVID-19 on self-reported social support levels, and how perceived change in social support related to distress, depression, and mental health.

designOne-time survey administered from April to August 2020

settingOnline

participantsPregnant and postpartum women with infants less than 6 months of age MEASUREMENT AND

findingsParticipants indicated the methods they used to meet social support needs during COVID-19. They self-rated their social support level pre- and during pandemic and their distress, depressive symptoms, and mental health changes on a Likert scale. Out of 1142 participants, the most effective methods for obtaining social support during the pandemic were virtual means (e.g. video call) and interaction with friends. There was a significant difference in distribution of self-reported levels of social support before and during the pandemic, with more respondents reporting a decrease in support. Decreases in social support were associated with higher distress levels, higher levels of depressive symptoms, and poorer mental health. KEY

conclusionsPerinatal women reported decreased social support during the COVID-19 pandemic which was associated with poorer mental health. Using virtual means of social support and support provided by friends had the largest positive effect on perceived social support levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Interventions using virtual support means from friends may be helpful to improve social support and mental health in this population.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnxietyFemaleHumansMothersPregnancySARS-CoV-2Social SupportStress, PsychologicalDepressionMental healthPandemicPerinatalPostpartumStress

Identifiers

PMID34649034
PMCPMC8485715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.