ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2021
Catalytic Fields as a Tool to Analyze Enzyme Reaction Mechanism Variants and Reaction Steps.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrostatic Preorganization in Three Distinct Heterogeneous Proteasome β-Subunits.ACS catalysis · 2024Article
- Perspectives on Computational Enzyme Modeling: From Mechanisms to Design and Drug Development.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Review
- Free Energy Profile Decomposition Analysis for QM/MM Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catalytic fields representing the topology of the optimal molecular environment charge distribution that reduces the activation barrier have been used to examine alternative reaction variants and to determine the role of conserved catalytic residues for two consecutive reactions catalyzed by the same enzyme. Until now, most experimental and conventional top-down theoretical studies employing QM/MM or ONIOM methods have focused on the role of enzyme electric fields acting on broken bonds of reactants. In contrast, our bottom-up approach dealing with a small reactant and transition-state model allows the analysis of the opposite effects: how the catalytic field resulting from the charge redistribution during the enzyme reaction acts on conserved amino acid residues and contributes to the reduction of the activation barrier. This approach has been applied to the family of histidyl tRNA synthetases involved in the translation of the genetic code into the protein amino acid sequence. Activation energy changes related to conserved charged amino acid residues for 12 histidyl tRNA synthetases from different biological species allowed to compare on equal footing the catalytic residues involved in ATP aminoacylation and tRNA charging reactions and to analyze different reaction mechanisms proposed in the literature. A scan of the library of atomic multipoles for amino acid side-chain rotamers within the catalytic field pointed out the change in the Glu83 conformation as the critical catalytic effect, providing, at low computational cost, insight into the electrostatic preorganization of the enzyme catalytic site at a level of detail that has not yet been accessible in conventional experimental or theoretical methods. This opens the way for rational reverse biocatalyst design at a very limited computational cost without resorting to empirical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.