Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34648538›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Health system responsiveness in maternity care at Hadiya zone public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: Users' perspectives.

Ritbano Ahmed Abdo, Hassen Mosa Halil, Biruk Assefa Kebede, Abebe Alemu Anshebo, Minychil Demelash Ayalew, Selamu Abose Nedamo, Shamill Eanga Helill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ritbano Ahmed AbdoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2867-7526
Hassen Mosa HalilDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Biruk Assefa KebedeDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Abebe Alemu AnsheboDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Minychil Demelash AyalewDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Selamu Abose NedamoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Shamill Eanga HelillDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth system responsiveness refers to non-financial, non-clinical qualities of care that reflect respect for human dignity and interpersonal aspects of the care process. The non-clinical aspects of the health system are therefore essential to the provision of services to patients. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to assess the responsiveness in maternity care, domain performance and factors associated with responsiveness in maternity care in the Hadiya Zone public Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia.

methodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was employed on 413 participants using a systematic sampling technique from 1 July to 1 August 2020. An exit interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. EpiData (version 3.1) and SPSS (version 24) software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression were computed to identify the associated factors of health system responsiveness in maternity care at 95% CI.

resultsThe findings indicated that 53.0% of users gave high ratings for responsiveness in delivery care. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, mothers aged ≥ 35 (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.1-0.9), urban resident (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.5-4.8), obstetrics complications during the current pregnancy (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.1-3.0), and caesarean delivery (AOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.7) were factors associated with poor ratings for responsiveness in maternity care.

conclusionIn the hospitals under investigation, responsiveness in maternity care was found to be good. The findings of this study suggest that the ministry of health and regional health bureau needs to pay attention to health system responsiveness as an indicator of the quality of maternity care.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEthiopiaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, PublicHumansMaternal Health ServicesMothersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34648538
PMCPMC8516277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.