ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2021
Comment on "Reintroduction of the archaic variant of
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic approaches for understanding the evolution of the human brain.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Evaluating the effects of archaic protein-altering variants in living human adults.Science advances · 2025Article
- The activity and expression of adenylosuccinate lyase were reduced during modern human evolution, affecting brain and behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- DCHS1 Modulates Forebrain Proportions in Modern Humans via a Glycosylation Change.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The modern human aryl hydrocarbon receptor is more active when ancestralized by genome editing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- More than a decade of genetic research on the Denisovans.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Human-specific genetics: new tools to explore the molecular and cellular basis of human evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Efficient high-precision homology-directed repair-dependent genome editing by HDRobust.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Comparative physiological anthropogeny: exploring molecular underpinnings of distinctly human phenotypes.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- A Neanderthal/Denisovan GLI3 variant contributes to anatomical variations in mice.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- The contribution of Neanderthal introgression to modern human traits.Current biology : CB · 2022Review
- Predicting Archaic Hominin Phenotypes from Genomic Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022Review
- Longer metaphase and fewer chromosome segregation errors in modern human than Neanderthal brain development.Science advances · 2022Article
- Homozygous might be hemizygous: CRISPR/Cas9 editing in iPSCs results in detrimental on-target defects that escape standard quality controls.Stem cell reports · 2022Article
- What Are the Human-Specific Aspects of Neocortex Development?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trujillo
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.