Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34648121›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2021

Effectiveness of Create ML in microscopy image classifications: a simple and inexpensive deep learning pipeline for non-data scientists.

Kiyotaka Nagaki, Tomoyuki Furuta, Naoki Yamaji, Daichi Kuniyoshi, Megumi Ishihara, Yuji Kishima, Minoru Murata, Atsushi Hoshino, Hirotomo Takatsuka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 100 Years of Chromosome Research in Rye,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kiyotaka NagakiInstitute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, 710-0046, Japan. nagaki@rib.okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-9267-4106
Tomoyuki FurutaInstitute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, 710-0046, Japan.
Naoki YamajiInstitute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, 710-0046, Japan.
Daichi KuniyoshiLaboratory of Plant Breeding, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan.
Megumi IshiharaLaboratory of Plant Breeding, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan.
Yuji KishimaLaboratory of Plant Breeding, Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan.
Minoru MurataDepartment of Agricultural and Food Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900, Kampar, Perak, Malaysia.
Atsushi HoshinoNational Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, 444-8585, Japan.
Hirotomo TakatsukaGraduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPOkayama University · JPKanazawa University · JPNational Institute for Basic Biology · JPOkayama University of Science · JPUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman · MY

Funding

japan society for the promotion of science 19H00937national institute for basic biology 20-328okayama university 2838okayama university 2839okayama university IP2019okayama university R240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observing chromosomes is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process, and chromosomes have been analyzed manually for many years. In the last decade, automated acquisition systems for microscopic images have advanced dramatically due to advances in their controlling computer systems, and nowadays, it is possible to automatically acquire sets of tiling-images consisting of large number, more than 1000, of images from large areas of specimens. However, there has been no simple and inexpensive system to efficiently select images containing mitotic cells among these images. In this paper, a classification system of chromosomal images by deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) that can be easily handled by non-data scientists was applied. With this system, models suitable for our own samples could be easily built on a Macintosh computer with Create ML. As examples, models constructed by learning using chromosome images derived from various plant species were able to classify images containing mitotic cells among samples from plant species not used for learning in addition to samples from the species used. The system also worked for cells in tissue sections and tetrads. Since this system is inexpensive and can be easily trained via deep learning using scientists' own samples, it can be used not only for chromosomal image analysis but also for analysis of other biology-related images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopychromosomedeep learningMachine learningmicroscopemitotic celltetrad

Identifiers

PMID34648121
OpenAlexW3205806234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.