Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34648039›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

["Risk it"-why women who do not intend to get pregnant do not use contraception : Results of the BZgA study "Women's lives 3. Family planning in women's lives"].

Cornelia Helfferich, Janet-Lynn Holz, Tilmann Knittel, Laura Olejniczak, Franziska Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cornelia HelfferichSozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut zu Geschlechterfragen an der Evangelischen Hochschule (EH) Freiburg, SoFFI F./FIVE, Bugginger Str. 38, 79114, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Janet-Lynn HolzSozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut zu Geschlechterfragen an der Evangelischen Hochschule (EH) Freiburg, SoFFI F./FIVE, Bugginger Str. 38, 79114, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Tilmann KnittelSozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut zu Geschlechterfragen an der Evangelischen Hochschule (EH) Freiburg, SoFFI F./FIVE, Bugginger Str. 38, 79114, Freiburg, Deutschland. tilmann.knittel@eh-freiburg.de.
Laura OlejniczakSozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut zu Geschlechterfragen an der Evangelischen Hochschule (EH) Freiburg, SoFFI F./FIVE, Bugginger Str. 38, 79114, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Franziska SchmidtSozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsinstitut zu Geschlechterfragen an der Evangelischen Hochschule (EH) Freiburg, SoFFI F./FIVE, Bugginger Str. 38, 79114, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite widespread access to contraception, it is observed that women without pregnancy intention do not use contraception and become pregnant. AIM OF THIS PAPER: The analyses conducted in this paper aim to assess the prevalence of the phenomenon of non-use of contraception for Germany and to gain a better understanding of the reasons why women risk unintended pregnancy. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing quantitative survey data on 17,400 pregnancies and 116 open qualitative interviews from the study "Women's lives 3: Family planning in women's lives" conducted on behalf of the Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), statements can be made on the prevalence of non-use of contraceptive methods despite a lack of pregnancy intention and on the underlying reasons.

resultsThe reasons given for not using contraception can be assigned to three very different motives: a) playing with a desire to have children, which is mentioned by just under one third; b) individual and structural barriers, such as health reservations or too high costs; and c) not using contraception because of the erroneous assumption of not being able to get pregnant. It can be seen that these motives vary in prevalence depending on the biographical situation. DISCUSSION: The results point to the need for a more differentiated understanding of unintended pregnancies in both research and prevention. A limitation and thus a need for future research is that the influence of the (sexual) partner on the contraceptive behaviour of women and on the intentionality of the pregnancy cannot be examined within the framework of the study.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesChildContraception BehaviorFemaleGermanyHumansPregnancySex EducationContraceptionDesire for childrenFamily planningUnintended pregnanciesUnwanted pergnancies

Identifiers

PMID34648039
PMCPMC8549921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.