Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34648011›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2021

Effectiveness of a Psychosocial Care Quality Improvement Strategy to Address Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: The HuCare2 Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.

Caterina Caminiti, Maria Antonietta Annunziata, Claudio Verusio, Carmine Pinto, Mario Airoldi, Marcello Aragona, Francesca Caputo, Saverio Cinieri, Paolo Giordani, Stefania Gori and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03008993 (Trial Clinico Controllato e Randomizzato, Con Disegno a Cluster Stepped-wedge, Per Valutare Una Strategia Volta ad Ottimizzare Gli Outcomes Psicosociali in Pazienti Affetti da Cancro), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03008993 nacompletednot on this map

Trial Clinico Controllato e Randomizzato, Con Disegno a Cluster Stepped-wedge, Per Valutare Una Strategia Volta ad Ottimizzare Gli Outcomes Psicosociali in Pazienti Affetti da Cancro

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Ospitalieri di CremonaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled762ConditionsCancerArmsHQIS implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Caterina CaminitiResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria Antonietta AnnunziataOncological Psychology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.
Claudio VerusioDepartment of Oncology, ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Varese, Italy.
Carmine PintoMedical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Center, AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Mario AiroldiSecond Medical Oncology Division, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marcello AragonaMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Francesca CaputoOncology Unit, Dei Colli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Saverio CinieriOncology Unit, San Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy.
Paolo GiordaniMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro and Fano, Italy.
Stefania GoriMedical Oncology Division, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Rodolfo MattioliMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro and Fano, Italy.
Silvia NovelloDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, AOU San Luigi Orbassano, Italy.
Antonio PazzolaMedical Oncology Unit, University-Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Giuseppe ProcopioDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Antonio RussoMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppina SarobbaOncology Unit, San Francesco Hospital, ATS Sardegna ASSL Nuoro, Nuoro, Italy.
Filippo ZerilliDepartment of Oncology, ASP of Trapani, Trapani, Italy.
Francesca DiodatiResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Elisa IezziResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Giuseppe MagliettaResearch and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Rodolfo PassalacquaMedical Oncology Division, Department of Oncology, ASST of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Many patients with cancer who would benefit from psychosocial care do not receive it. Implementation strategies may favor the integration of psychosocial care into practice and improve patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Humanization in Cancer Care (HuCare) Quality Improvement Strategy vs standard care as improvement of at least 1 of 2 domains (emotional or social function) of patient health-related quality of life at baseline and 3 months. A key secondary aim included investigation of the long-term effect. Design, Setting, and Participants: HuCare2 was a multicenter, incomplete, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 30, 2016, to August 28, 2019, in three 5-center clusters of cancer centers representative of hospital size and geographic location in Italy. The study was divided into 5 equally spaced epochs. Implementation sequence was defined by a blinded statistician; the nature of the intervention precluded blinding for clinical staff. Participants included consecutive adult outpatients with newly diagnosed cancer of any type and stage starting medical cancer treatment. Interventions: The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy comprised (1) clinician communication training, (2) on-site visits for context analysis and problem-solving, and (3) implementation of 6 evidence-based recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the difference between the means of changes of individual scores in emotional or social functions of health-related quality of life detected at baseline and 3-month follow-up (within each group) and during the postintervention epoch compared with control periods (between groups). Long-term effect of the intervention (at 12 months) was assessed as a secondary outcome. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: A total of 762 patients (475 [62.3%] women) were enrolled (400 HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy and 362 usual care); mean (SD) age was 61.4 (13.1) years. The HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved emotional function during treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P = .008) but not social function (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.09; P = .80). Effect on emotional function persisted at 12 months (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, the HuCare Quality Improvement Strategy significantly improved the emotional function aspect of health-related quality of life during cancer treatment and at 12 months, indicating a change in clinician behavior and in ward organization. These findings support the need for strategies to introduce psychosocial care; however, more research is needed on factors that may maximize the effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03008993.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAgedCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychiatric RehabilitationQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID34648011
PMCPMC8517739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.