Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647893›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Acceptability, Engagement, and Effects of a Mobile Digital Intervention to Support Mental Health for Young Adults Transitioning to College: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Brian Suffoletto, Tina Goldstein, Dawn Gotkiewicz, Emily Gotkiewicz, Brandie George, David Brent

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04560075 (ETUDES Center- Text2Connect - Phase 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04560075 nacompletednot on this map

ETUDES Center- Text2Connect - Phase 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2020 to 2021Enrolled52ConditionsDepression, Suicidal IdeationArmsText2Connect, Psychoeducational Videos (PE) Only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian SuffolettoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9628-5260
Tina GoldsteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4762-8060
Dawn GotkiewiczDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6909-3255
Emily GotkiewiczUniversity of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-9930
Brandie GeorgeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-3697
David BrentDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-2157

Funding

The Center for Enhancing Triage and Utilization for Depression and Emergent Suicidality (ETUDES) in Pediatric Primary CareP50MH115838 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BRUCE Lawrence ROLLMAN · 2018 to 2026
$25.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transition from high school to college can exacerbate mental health problems in young adults yet barriers prevent seamless mental health care. Existing digital support tools show promise but are not yet designed to optimize engagement or implementation.

objectiveThe goal of the research was to test acceptability and effects of an automated digital Mobile Support Tool for Mental Health (MoST-MH) for young adults transitioning to college.

methodsYouths aged 18 years and older with a current mental health diagnosis preparing to transition to college (n=52; 85% female [45/52], 91% White [48/52]) were recruited from a primary care (n=31) and a mental health clinic (n=21). Participants were randomized 2:1 to either receive MoST-MH (n=34) or enhanced Usual Care (eUC; n=18). MoST-MH included periodic text message and web-based check-ins of emotional health, stressors, negative impacts, and self-efficacy that informed tailored self-care support messages. Both eUC and MoST-MH participants received links to a library of psychoeducational videos and were asked to complete web-based versions of the Mental Health Self-Efficacy Scale (MHSES), College Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS), and Client Service Receipt Inventory for Mental Health (C-SRI) monthly for 3 months and the Post-Study System Usability Scale (PSSUQ) at 3-months.

resultsMoST-MH participants were sent a median of 5 (range 3 to 10) text message check-in prompts over the 3-month study period and 100% were completed; participants were sent a median of 2 (range 1 to 8) web-based check-in prompts among which 78% (43/55) were completed. PSSUQ scores indicate high usability (mean score 2.0). Results from the completer analysis demonstrated reductions in mental health symptoms over time and significant between-group effects of MoST-MH compared to eUC on depressive symptom severity (d=0.36, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.64). No significant differences in mental health self-efficacy or mental health health care use were observed.

conclusionsIn this pilot trial, we found preliminary evidence that MoST-MH was engaged with at high rates and found to be highly usable and reduced depression symptoms relative to eUC among youth with mental health disorders transitioning to college. Findings were measured during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the study was not powered to detect differences in outcomes between groups; therefore, further testing is needed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04560075; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04560075.

Indexed as

collegedigital interventionmental healthmHealthself-management

Identifiers

PMID34647893
PMCPMC8554670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.