Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647696›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2022

Vascular Ultrasound for Giant Cell Arteritis: Establishing a Protocol Using Vascular Sonographers in a Fast-Track Clinic in the United States.

Charles Oshinsky, Alison M Bays, Ingeborg Sacksen, Elizabeth Jernberg, R Eugene Zierler, Andreas P Diamantopoulos, Jean W Liew, Sarah H Chung, P Scott Pollock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnosing vasculitis with ultrasound: findings and pitfalls.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles OshinskyUniversity of Washington, Seattle.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-348X
Alison M BaysUniversity of Washington, Seattle.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-6303
Ingeborg SacksenUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Elizabeth JernbergVirginia Mason, Seattle, Washington.
R Eugene ZierlerUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Andreas P DiamantopoulosMartina Hansens Hospital, Gjettum, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-1895
Jean W LiewBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-2450
Sarah H ChungUniversity of Washington, Seattle.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9562-2317
P Scott PollockUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
University of Washington · USBoston University · USMartina Hansens Hospital · NOVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe developed a fast-track clinic (FTC) to expedite the evaluation of patients suspected of having giant cell arteritis (GCA) using vascular ultrasound. Though FTCs have demonstrated efficacy in Europe, no protocolized clinic in the United States has been developed. This study introduces a new FTC model unique to the United States, using vascular sonographers, and describes the protocols used to develop reliable findings. We evaluate clinical outcomes using vascular ultrasound and temporal artery biopsy (TAB).

methodsA retrospective review included all subjects referred to the University of Washington FTC aged 50 years old or older who received both ultrasound and TAB between November 2017 and November 2019. Ultrasound was performed by a vascular sonographer trained in GCA detection. Ultrasound results were read by a vascular surgeon and reviewed by four rheumatologists certified in musculoskeletal ultrasound who had completed a course in vascular ultrasound use in GCA and large-vessel vasculitis.

resultsA total of 43 subjects underwent both vascular ultrasound and TAB. Six subjects had both positive ultrasound and TAB results. There were also seven positive ultrasound results in patients with negative TAB results, most due to detection of large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA). All 29 subjects with negative ultrasound results had negative TAB results.

conclusionThis is the first study in the United States to demonstrate a reliable FTC protocol using vascular sonographers. This protocol demonstrated good agreement between ultrasound and TAB and allowed for the detection of additional cases of LV-GCA by vascular ultrasound. Vascular ultrasound improved the rate of GCA diagnosis primarily by detecting additional cases of LV-GCA.

Identifiers

PMID34647696
PMCPMC8754016
OpenAlexW3207545878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.