Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647237›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2021

Is intraoperative neuromonitoring effective in hip and pelvis orthopedic and trauma surgery? A systematic review.

Luigi Murena, Giulia Colin, Micol Dussi, Gianluca Canton

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luigi MurenaOrthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Cattinara Hospital-ASUGI, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Giulia ColinOrthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Cattinara Hospital-ASUGI, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy. giulia.colin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-8419
Micol DussiOrthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Cattinara Hospital-ASUGI, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Gianluca CantonOrthopaedics and Traumatology Unit, Cattinara Hospital-ASUGI, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Ospedale di Cattinara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSciatic nerve injury is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication in hip and pelvis surgery. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) was applied since the seventies in neurosurgery and spine surgery. Nowadays, IONM has gained popularity in other surgical specialities including orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Aim of this systematic review is to resume the literature evidences about the effectiveness of intraoperative monitoring of sciatic nerve during pelvic and hip surgery.

methodsTwo reviewers (GC and MD) independently identified studies by a systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar from inception of database to 10 January 2021. Inclusion criteria were: (a) English written papers, (b) use of any type of intraoperative nerve monitoring during traumatic or elective pelvic and hip surgery, (c) comparison of the outcomes between patients who underwent nerve monitoring and patient who underwent standard procedures, (d) all study types including case reports. The present review was conducted in accordance with the 2009 PRISMA statement.

resultsThe literature search produced 224 papers from PubMed and 594 from Google Scholar, with a total amount of 818 papers. The two reviewer excluded 683 papers by title or duplicates. Of the 135 remaining, 72 were excluded after reading the abstract, and 31 by reading the full text. Thus, 32 papers were finally included in the review.

conclusionsThe use of IONM during hip and pelvis surgery is debated. The review results are insufficient to support the routine use of IONM in hip and pelvis surgery. The different IONM techniques have peculiar advantages and disadvantages and differences in sensitivity and specificity without clear evidence of superiority for any. Results from different studies and different interventions are often in contrast. However, there is general agreement in recognizing a role for IONM to define the critical maneuvers, positions or pathologies that could lead to sciatic nerve intraoperative damage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Indexed as

OrthopedicsHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresPelvisRetrospective StudiesHipIONMPelvisSciatic nerve palsy

Identifiers

PMID34647237
PMCPMC8514601
OpenAlexW3207189711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.