Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647183›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2021

Twist drill craniostomy vs burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karan J Yagnik, Anshit Goyal, Jamie J Van Gompel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06337851 (Comparing Simultaneous and Consecutive Drainage of Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06337851 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Simultaneous and Consecutive Drainage of Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtaturk Training and Research HospitalRan2003 to 2011Enrolled43ConditionsSubdural Hematoma, ChronicArmsSimultaneous burr hole craniostomy, Consecutive burr hole craniostomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Subdural Hematomas in Adults and Children.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karan J YagnikDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Anshit GoyalDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. goyal.anshit@mayo.edu.
Jamie J Van GompelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. vangompel.jamie@mayo.edu.
Neurological Surgery · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a clinical equipoise between burr hole drainage (BHD) or twist drill craniotomy (TDC) as initial surgical intervention in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Moreover, the impact of type of postoperative drainage is not well elucidated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes following BHD and TDC for initial surgical management in cSDH and to understand the impact of negative suction drainage with TDC.

methodsA literature search was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for studies that directly compared TDC and BHD. The following outcomes were compared between TDC and BHD: mortality, recurrence, reoperations, complications, and cure rates. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine impact of negative suction drainage with TDC.

resultsSixteen articles (n = 1,235; TDC: 663; BHD: 591) met inclusion criteria. Although complications (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.38-1.23, p = 0.21; I

conclusionA systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature directly comparing TDC and BHD for primary evacuation of cSDH did not demonstrate clear superiority of either technique, although reoperations may be higher following TDC. Use of negative suction drainage with TDC may lead to similar rates of reoperation as BHD.

Indexed as

Hematoma, Subdural, ChronicCraniotomyDrainageHumansRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTrephiningBurr holeChronic subdural hematomaCraniotomyLiterature reviewSubdural drainageTwist drill

Identifiers

PMID34647183
OpenAlexW3206576497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.