Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647181›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

The Short-Form Neck Disability index has adequate measurement properties in chronic neck pain patients.

André Pontes-Silva, Mariana Arias Avila, Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

André Pontes-SilvaPostgraduate Program in Adult Health, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, Vila Bacanga, São Luís, MA, 65080-805, Brazil. contato.andrepsilva@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3983-5342
Mariana Arias AvilaPostgraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5081-5326
Cid André Fidelis-de-Paula-GomesPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6627-7537
Almir Vieira Dibai-FilhoPostgraduate Program in Adult Health, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, Vila Bacanga, São Luís, MA, 65080-805, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5403-8248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and the presence of ceiling and floor effects in the Brazilian version of the Short-Form Neck Disability Index (SF-NDI) in patients with chronic neck pain.

methodsOne hundred and fifty-six patients answered the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Short-Form Neck Disability Index (SF-NDI), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Another sample (n = 51) filled the SF-NDI at two different times, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC). The internal consistency of the SF-NDI was analyzed by Cronbach's alpha. To determine construct validity, Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine the magnitude of the correlation between the score of the SF-NDI and other measurement instruments: NPRS, TKS, PCS, SF-36, and original NDI.

resultsSF-NDI presented substantial reliability (ICC = 0.844) and adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.778). We observed significant values and with a correlation magnitude greater than 0.80 for the SF-NDI with the original NDI, between 0.30 and 0.50 for the correlations with TKS, and the functional capacity and pain domains of the SF-36, and less than 0.30 with the other study instruments. No participant reached the maximum score. Ceiling and floor effects were not observed.

conclusionsSF-NDI with 5 items has adequate measurement properties in Brazilian chronic neck pain patients.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNeck PainDisability EvaluationHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesNeck painReproducibility of resultsSF-NDISpineSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34647181
PMCPMC8514279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.