Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647179›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in France on the diagnosis and staging of breast cancers in a tertiary cancer centre.

Pierre-Antoine Linck, Cassandre Garnier, Marie-Pierre Depetiteville, Gaëtan MacGrogan, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Nathalie Quénel-Tueux, Hélène Charitansky, Martine Boisserie-Lacroix, Foucauld Chamming's

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Breast cancer care amidst a pandemic: a scoping review to understand the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on health services and health outcomes.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pierre-Antoine LinckDepartment of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Cassandre GarnierDepartment of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Marie-Pierre DepetitevilleDepartment of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Gaëtan MacGroganDepartment of Pathology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Simone Mathoulin-PélissierUnité D'Épidémiologie Et de Recherche Cliniques, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Nathalie Quénel-TueuxDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène CharitanskyDepartment of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Martine Boisserie-LacroixDepartment of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Foucauld Chamming'sDepartment of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 33076, Bordeaux, France. f.chammings@bordeaux.unicancer.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDue to COVID-19, a lockdown took place between March 17 and May 1, 2020, in France. This study evaluates the impact of the lockdown on the diagnosis and staging of breast cancers in a tertiary cancer centre.

methodsOur database was searched for all consecutive invasive breast cancers diagnosed in our institution during the lockdown (36 working days), during equivalent periods of 36 working days before and after lockdown and a reference period in 2019. The number and staging of breast cancers diagnosed during and after lockdown were compared to the pre-lockdown and reference periods. Tumour maximum diameters were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Proportions of tumour size categories (T), ipsilateral axillary lymph node invasion (N) and presence of distant metastasis (M) were compared using Fisher's exact test.

resultsCompared to the reference period (n = 40 in average), the number of breast cancers diagnosed during lockdown (n = 32) decreased by 20% but increased by 48% after the lockdown (n = 59). After the lockdown, comparatively to the reference period, breast cancers were more often symptomatic (86% vs 57%; p = 0.001) and demonstrated bigger tumour sizes (p = 0.0008), the rates of small tumours (T1) were reduced by 38%, locally advanced cancers (T3, T4) increased by 80% and lymph node invasion increased by 64%.

conclusionThe COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a 20% decrease in the number of diagnosed breast cancers. Because of delayed diagnosis, breast cancers detected after the lockdown had poorer prognosis with bigger tumour sizes and higher rates of node invasion. KEY POINTS: • The number of breast cancer diagnosed in a large tertiary cancer centre in France decreased by 20% during the first COVID-19 lockdown. • Because of delayed diagnosis, breast cancers demonstrated bigger tumour size and more frequent axillary lymph node invasion after the lockdown. • In case of a new lockdown, breast screening programme and follow-up examinations should not be suspended and patients with clinical symptoms should be encouraged to seek attention promptly.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19AxillaCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingSARS-CoV-2Breast cancerCOVID-19DiagnosisLockdownNeoplasm staging

Identifiers

PMID34647179
PMCPMC8514205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.