Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647108›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2021

Comparison of Tumor Microenvironments Between Primary Tumors and Brain Metastases in Patients With NSCLC.

Daiki Ikarashi, Tamio Okimoto, Takehito Shukuya, Hiroko Onagi, Takuo Hayashi, Sara L Sinicropi-Yao, Joseph M Amann, Tetsuya Nakatsura, Shigehisa Kitano, David P Carbone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Personalizing non-small cell lung cancer treatment through patient-derived xenograft models: preclinical and clinical factors for consideration.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. High CD204Journal of Cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daiki IkarashiDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy Development, Advanced Medical Development Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), Tokyo, Japan.
Tamio OkimotoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Takehito ShukuyaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Hiroko OnagiDepartment of Human Pathology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuo HayashiDepartment of Human Pathology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sara L Sinicropi-YaoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Joseph M AmannDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Tetsuya NakatsuraDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Shigehisa KitanoDivision of Cancer Immunotherapy Development, Advanced Medical Development Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), Tokyo, Japan.
David P CarboneDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · USJuntendo University · JPIwate Medical University · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study investigates the immune profile of the primary lung tumors and the corresponding brain metastasis from patients with NSCLC using multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry.

methodsThe study evaluated 34 patients who underwent autopsy or surgical resection for brain metastasis and autopsy, surgical resection, or core biopsy for primary lung cancer. We compared the densities of various immune cells in the primary tumors and the brain metastases by multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemical analysis.

resultsThe density of CD4-positive (CD4

conclusionsOur findings that CD204-positive cells were higher in brain metastases may have broader implications for treatment as these macrophages may be immunosuppressive and make the immune environment less reactive. Furthermore, the finding that the density of CD4

Indexed as

Brain metastasisMicroenvironmentNon–small cell lung cancerPrimary tumorRadiation

Identifiers

PMID34647108
PMCPMC8501504
OpenAlexW3200590087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.