ArticleJTCVS techniques2021
Three-dimensional printing to plan intracardiac operations.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Pilot Study on Integrating 3D-Printed Models Into Undergraduate Medical Education for Congenital Heart Disease.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- The development of direct 3-dimensional printing of patient-specific mitral valve in soft material for simulation and procedural planning.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- Impact of three-dimensional imaging and printing on septal myectomy results-single centre's experience.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Three-dimensional printed moulds to obtain silicone hearts with congenital defects for paediatric heart-surgeon training.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022Article
- Commentary: All models are wrong, but some are useful.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
- Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Patient-Specific Direct 3D-Printed Aortic Valve for Simulation Trainings: A Comparative Study.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.