ReviewPalliative care and social practice2021
New public health approaches to palliative care, a brave new horizon or an impractical ideal? An Integrative literature review with thematic synthesis.
Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond grief: Quantifying bereavement needs of rural family caregivers.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Trial
- Participatory System Mapping of a Hospice Care System With Hospice Stakeholders: Hybrid Design Workshop Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges for formalizing community-based palliative care volunteer work: An ethnographic study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- From the hospital to the community: reshaping the palliative care paradigm.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Narrative review comparing palliative care models in primary and community care settings: For a better integration of nurses' activities and skills.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
- Death literacy: A document analysis review of the United Kingdom's four countries' policies.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
- "Being ill defines your daily life": Social wellbeing of patients residing at home facing an incurable illness and their primary family caregivers.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Adopting the lens of the COM-B behaviour change model to qualitatively explore and understand public health implications of young adults' attitudes towards death-talk.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Spiritual Care Competence in Palliative Care: A Concept Analysis.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
- Satisfaction with Care Received at the End of Life in Portugal: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Integrating ACP into Nigeria's culture and healthcare system for improved end-of-life care.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Systematic adaptation of public health palliative care interventions across settings using ADAPT guidance: Methodological learnings from the EU NAVIGATE project.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing nursing's role in community-based palliative care: closing gaps to improve patient outcomes.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Palliative care training programmes for community volunteers working with children and their families: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Connecting communities across the globe: Atlas protocol.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- From living well to dying well with dementia: The significance of an expanded understanding of loss for end-of-life care.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Destigmatizing Palliative Care among Young Adults-A Theoretical Intervention Mapping Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Palliative care - too complex to make it simple.Croatian medical journal · 2024Article
- Building public engagement and access to palliative care and advance care planning: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Physicians' perceptions of the implementation of the serious illness care program: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Access to palliative care for marginalized communities is frequently problematized as a major challenge facing palliative care services. The traditional response of asking what services can do for the disadvantaged has been invigorated by a new wave of public health measures that embrace death and dying as social processes and ask, what can be done together with such communities as partners working in palliative care. Such work has generated a significant amount of academic, social and political interests over the last 20 years; however, we are yet to see a consistent and sustained change in approach from providers. We argue that this is due to inherent tensions that arise when modelling death, dying and loss as a unified and shared social process. Unresolved tensions destabilize the theoretical foundations and risk misrepresentation of core philosophies. In this integrative review of 75 articles, we present previously undiscussed areas of contention drawing from a pan-disciplinary field of theoretical and empirical evidence. We conclude that new public health approaches lack a consistent and unified theoretical approach. From philosophical, ontological and existential ideas relating to how different stakeholders conceptualize death, to the processes by which communities are motivated and their constituent members empowered through responsibilized notions of duty and reciprocity, there is little acknowledgement of the complex tensions at hand. Increasing academic and political initiative alone is not enough to progress this movement in a manner that achieves its full potential. Instead, we must pay greater attention to the tensions described. This article aims to work with such tensions to better define the landscape of collective moral responsibility in end-of-life care. We believe that this is crucial if palliative care is to avoid becoming a technical speciality with community and communitization reduced to a mere technical solution to more profound questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.