Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34647026›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Anesthesia triggers drug delivery to experimental glioma in mice by hijacking caveolar transport.

Lena Spieth, Stefan A Berghoff, Sina K Stumpf, Jan Winchenbach, Thomas Michaelis, Takashi Watanabe, Nina Gerndt, Tim Düking, Sabine Hofer, Torben Ruhwedel and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mesoscopic mapping of hemodynamic responses and neuronal activity during pharmacologically induced interictal spikes in awake and anesthetized mice.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Effects of Propofol on a HumanFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lena SpiethMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefan A BerghoffMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Sina K StumpfMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Jan WinchenbachMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas MichaelisMax-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Biomedizinische NMR, Göttingen, Germany.
Takashi WatanabeMax-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Biomedizinische NMR, Göttingen, Germany.
Nina GerndtMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim DükingMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Sabine HoferMax-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Biomedizinische NMR, Göttingen, Germany.
Torben RuhwedelMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Ali H ShaibMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Katrin WilligMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Group of Optical Nanoscopy in Neuroscience, Göttingen, Germany.
Katharina KronenbergWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Münster, Germany.
Uwe KarstWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Münster, Germany.
Jens FrahmMax-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Biomedizinische NMR, Göttingen, Germany.
Jeong Seop RheeMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Susana MinguetAlbert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Freiburg, Germany. Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, Freiburg, Germany. Center of Chronic Immunodeficiency CCI, University Clinics and Medical Faculty, Freiburg, Germany.
Wiebke MöbiusMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.
Niels KruseUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Institute for Neuropathology, Göttingen, Germany.
Christian von der BrelieUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Institute for Neurosurgery, Göttingen, Germany.
Peter MichelsUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Institute for Anesthesiology, Göttingen, Germany.
Christine StadelmannUniversity Medical Center Göttingen, Institute for Neuropathology, Göttingen, Germany.
Petra HülperKlinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, University Hospital, Germany.
Gesine SaherMax-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Neurogenetics, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-9604
Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DENanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain Cluster of Excellence 171 — DFG Research Center 103 · DEUniversity of Münster · DEKlinikum Oldenburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmaceutical intervention in the CNS is hampered by the shielding function of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To induce clinical anesthesia, general anesthetics such as isoflurane readily penetrate the BBB. Here, we investigated whether isoflurane can be utilized for therapeutic drug delivery.

methodsBarrier function in primary endothelial cells was evaluated by transepithelial/transendothelial electrical resistance, and nanoscale STED and SRRF microscopy. In mice, BBB permeability was quantified by extravasation of several fluorescent tracers. Mouse models including the GL261 glioma model were evaluated by MRI, immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, western blot, and expression analysis.

resultsIsoflurane enhances BBB permeability in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. We demonstrate that, mechanistically, isoflurane disturbs the organization of membrane lipid nanodomains and triggers caveolar transport in brain endothelial cells. BBB tightness re-establishes directly after termination of anesthesia, providing a defined window for drug delivery. In a therapeutic glioblastoma trial in mice, simultaneous exposure to isoflurane and cytotoxic agent improves efficacy of chemotherapy.

conclusionsCombination therapy, involving isoflurane-mediated BBB permeation with drug administration has far-reaching therapeutic implications for CNS malignancies.

Indexed as

bloodbrain barrierchemotherapydrug deliverygeneral anesthesiaglioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID34647026
PMCPMC8500692
OpenAlexW3201167821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.