ArticleSSM - population health2021
Can digital health technologies exacerbate the health gap? A clustering analysis of mothers' opinions toward digitizing the maternal and child health handbook.
Article in SSM - population health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of mHealth consultation services for preventing postpartum depressive symptoms: a randomized clinical trial.BMC medicine · 2023Trial
- Socio-digital stratification and the threshold effects of digital inclusion on maternal health access in Somalia.Global health action · 2026Article
- From handbooks to platforms: Japan's maternal and child health services in the digital era.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Digital divide as a determinant of health in the U.S. older adults: prevalence, trends, and risk factors.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- The promise of digital health technologies for integrated care for maternal and child health and non-communicable diseases.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Exploring the Needs and Expectations of Expectant and New Parents for an mHealth Application to Support the First 1000 Days of Life: Steps toward a Co-Design Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review.SSM - population health · 2022Review
- "Must you make an app?" A qualitative exploration of socio-technical challenges and opportunities for designing digital maternal and child health solutions in Soweto, South Africa.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of mobile health has increased worldwide, but along with its increased utilization comes the risk of the digital divide, inequity in access to information and communications technologies, exerting greater influence on health inequity caused by socioeconomic determinants of health. There is a growing need to investigate whether the digitization of existing health interventions has a risk of worsening the health gap.
methodsWe investigated the attitudes of mothers and pregnant women toward digitization of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook (MCHH), a popular personal health record (PHR) used by almost every pregnant woman or mother in Japan, using a cross-sectional survey. We determined sociodemographic factors associated with favorable opinions toward digitization using a multivariate regression model. We then grouped the participants using partitioning around medoids clustering, a machine-learning approach, to interpret their varying attitudes toward digitization in light of their sociodemographic characteristics as well as their affinity toward the paper MCHH.
findingsHigher income and educational level, older age, and less reliance on the MCHH were significantly associated with favorable opinion toward digitization. Clustering analysis identified four latent clusters. The cluster with the highest socioeconomic status (SES) was the most favorable toward digitization, while two clusters with the lowest SES, one of which relied heavily on the paper MCHH, were less favorable of digitization compared to the high SES cluster. The final cluster was comprised of mothers with the experience of raising multiple children and did not rely heavily on the MCHH.
interpretationOur study identified a socioeconomic divide in opinions toward digitization of an existing health intervention. A hasty digitization may result in an unbalanced uptake of the digitized health intervention among different social classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.