Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34646932›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2021

Can digital health technologies exacerbate the health gap? A clustering analysis of mothers' opinions toward digitizing the maternal and child health handbook.

Ryunosuke Goto, Yoko Watanabe, Ako Yamazaki, Masatoshi Sugita, Satoru Takeda, Masao Nakabayashi, Yasuhide Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryunosuke GotoDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yoko WatanabeHachioji-city Public Health Center, 13-18 Asahicho, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0083, Japan.
Ako YamazakiImperial Gift Foundation Aiiku Maternal and Child Health Center, 5-6-8 Minami-Azabu, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-8580, Japan.
Masatoshi SugitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan.
Satoru TakedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Masao NakabayashiImperial Gift Foundation Aiiku Maternal and Child Health Center, 5-6-8 Minami-Azabu, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-8580, Japan.
Yasuhide NakamuraFriends of WHO Japan, 2-8, Honmachibashi, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 540-0029, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of mobile health has increased worldwide, but along with its increased utilization comes the risk of the digital divide, inequity in access to information and communications technologies, exerting greater influence on health inequity caused by socioeconomic determinants of health. There is a growing need to investigate whether the digitization of existing health interventions has a risk of worsening the health gap.

methodsWe investigated the attitudes of mothers and pregnant women toward digitization of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook (MCHH), a popular personal health record (PHR) used by almost every pregnant woman or mother in Japan, using a cross-sectional survey. We determined sociodemographic factors associated with favorable opinions toward digitization using a multivariate regression model. We then grouped the participants using partitioning around medoids clustering, a machine-learning approach, to interpret their varying attitudes toward digitization in light of their sociodemographic characteristics as well as their affinity toward the paper MCHH.

findingsHigher income and educational level, older age, and less reliance on the MCHH were significantly associated with favorable opinion toward digitization. Clustering analysis identified four latent clusters. The cluster with the highest socioeconomic status (SES) was the most favorable toward digitization, while two clusters with the lowest SES, one of which relied heavily on the paper MCHH, were less favorable of digitization compared to the high SES cluster. The final cluster was comprised of mothers with the experience of raising multiple children and did not rely heavily on the MCHH.

interpretationOur study identified a socioeconomic divide in opinions toward digitization of an existing health intervention. A hasty digitization may result in an unbalanced uptake of the digitized health intervention among different social classes.

Indexed as

DigitalDigital divideHealthHealth inequityMaternal and child healthSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34646932
PMCPMC8498452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.