Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34646893›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Effect of Meniscal Treatment on Functional Outcomes 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Aaron J Casp, Stephan G Bodkin, F Winston Gwathmey, Brian C Werner, Mark D Miller, David R Diduch, Stephen F Brockmeier, Joseph M Hart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Repair for Isolated Meniscus Tear in Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aaron J CaspAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Stephan G BodkinAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
F Winston GwathmeyAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Brian C WernerAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Mark D MillerAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
David R DiduchAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Stephen F BrockmeierAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Joseph M HartAll authors affiliated with the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeniscal injuries are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Treatment of meniscal injuries can impart delayed weightbearing and range of motion restrictions, which can affect the rehabilitation protocol. The effect of meniscal treatment and subsequent restrictions on strength recovery after ACL reconstruction is unclear. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare strength, jumping performance, and patient-reported outcomes between patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who underwent surgical intervention for meniscal pathology at the time of ACLR. Our hypothesis was that patients who underwent concurrent meniscal repair (MR) would have lower strength recovery owing to postoperative restrictions. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsPatients with ACLR were stratified into isolated ACLR, ACLR and meniscectomy (ACLR-MS), or ACLR-MR groups and were compared with healthy controls. The ACLR-MR group was restricted to partial weightbearing and to 90° of knee flexion for the first 6 weeks postoperatively. All participants completed patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) and underwent bilateral isokinetic and isometric strength tests of the knee extensor and flexor groups as part of a return-to-sports test battery at 5 to 7 months postoperatively.

resultsA total of 165 patients with ACLR (50 with isolated ACLR, 44 with ACLR-MS, and 71 with ACLR-MR) and 140 healthy controls were included in the study. Follow-up occurred at a mean of 5.96 ± 0.47 months postoperatively. The control group demonstrated higher subjective knee function, unilateral peak extensor torque, and limb symmetry than did the ACLR-MS and ACLR-MR groups combined (

conclusionPersistent weakness, asymmetry, and reduced subjective outcome scores at 6-month follow-up after ACLR were not influenced by meniscal treatment. These findings suggested that the weightbearing and range of motion restrictions associated with meniscal repair recovery do not result in loss of early strength or worse patient-reported outcomes.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionmeniscal repairrehabilitation after ACL reconstructionreturn-to-sport testing

Identifiers

PMID34646893
PMCPMC8504239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.