Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34646814›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2021

Isotope-Dilution Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Method for the Selective Detection of Nicotine and Menthol in E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Liquids and Aerosols.

José J Pérez, Clifford H Watson, Benjamin C Blount, Liza Valentín-Blasini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José J PérezTobacco Products Laboratory, Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Clifford H WatsonTobacco Products Laboratory, Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Benjamin C BlountTobacco Products Laboratory, Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Liza Valentín-BlasiniTobacco Products Laboratory, Tobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Environmental Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a quantitative method for analyzing nicotine and menthol in e-cigarette, or vaping, products (EVPs). These products may adversely impact health through inhalational exposure to addictive and harmful chemicals. The presence of unknown substances in do-it-yourself e-liquids, counterfeits, or unregulated products may increase exposure to harmful chemicals, as underscored by the 2019 EVP use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak. To minimize these risks, it is important to accurately quantify nicotine and menthol in e-liquids and aerosol emissions to evaluate EVP authenticity, verify product label accuracy, and identify potentially hazardous products. We developed a simple, versatile, high-throughput method using isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantifying nicotine and menthol concentrations in both e-liquid contents and machine-generated aerosol emissions of EVPs. Rigorous validation has demonstrated that the method is specific, precise (CV<2.71%), accurate (percent error ≤7.0%), and robust. Linear calibration ranges from 0.01 to 1.00 mg/ml for both analytes was achieved, corresponding to expected analyte levels in e-liquids and machine-generated EVP aerosols. Limits of detection (LODs) in the final 10-ml sample extract were 0.4 μg/ml for nicotine and 0.2 μg/ml for menthol. The method was used to analyze aerosol emissions of 141 EVPs associated with the 2019 EVALI outbreak; detectable levels of nicotine (2.19-59.5 mg/g of aerosol) and menthol (1.09-10.69 mg/g of aerosol) were observed in 28 and 11%, respectively, of the samples analyzed. Nicotine was not detected in any of the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), or oil-based products, while menthol (2.95 mg/g of aerosol) was only detected in one of these products (THC-labeled). The analytical method can be used to quantify nicotine and menthol concentrations in the e-liquids and aerosols from a range of EVPs, and these findings highlight a difference between e-cigarette and other vaping products.

Indexed as

e-cigarettesgas chromatography-mass spectrometrymentholnicotinevapes

Identifiers

PMID34646814
PMCPMC8503638
OpenAlexW3202155545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.