ArticleCureus2021
Diagnostic Accuracy of FIB-4 and FIB-5 Scores as Compared to Fibroscan for Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing Venous Congestion in Heart Failure: A Review of Splanchnic, Cardiac, and Pulmonary Ultrasound: Part 2: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prevalence of advanced fibrosis risk using FIB-4 in patients with type 2 diabetes and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study in a primary care unit of a university hospital in Southern Thailand.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Non-invasive scoring systems of liver fibrosis predict prognosis in the cohort with myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Linking gut permeability to liver steatosis: Noninvasive biomarker evaluation in MASLD patients - a prospective cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Useful Biomarkers for Preeclampsia: Evaluating the Diagnostic Potential of FIB-4 and FIB-5 Indices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Systemic Inflammatory Indices and Liver Dysfunction in Turner Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Case-control Study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Article
- Poor Performance of Non-invasive Tests for Advanced Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Multicentric Asian Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Relationship between Liver Stiffness and Steatosis in Obesity Conditions: In Vivo and In Vitro Studies.Biomolecules · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Limited access/exorbitant cost of fibroscan and the associated risks with biopsy to assess fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients has made exigent demand of serum-based fibrosis scores to be validated for their accuracy and efficacy. The objective of the study was to compare the accuracy of FIB-4 (fibrosis-4) and FIB-5 (fibrofast) scores to rule out advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients. Methods A total of 145 patients were categorized as group I with mild/moderate fibrosis (MF) comprising of F0 to F2 and group II with advanced fibrosis (AF) comprising of F3 and F4 based on fibroscan kPa (kilopascal) score. Results Group II had significantly higher alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), haemoglobin % (Hb %), bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values and significantly lower platelet count and albumin as compared to group I. The FIB-4 score was significantly higher in group II [1.8 (1.1 - 4.7)], as compared with group I [0.98 (0.63 - 1.67)], p-value = 0.0001. FIB-5 score of group II [-6.4 (-8.8 - 3.4)] was significantly lower as compared with group I [-4.8 (-6.8 - 2.0)], p-value = 0.003. FIB-4 and FIB-5 had area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.712 and 0.655, respectively. FIB-4 at cut-off of <2.02 had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.7%. FIB-5 at a cut-off of <-7.11 has an NPV of 94.1% and at a cut-off of <-3.24 had an NPV of 88.9%. Conclusion We concluded that both FIB-4 and FIB-5 can be used to rule out advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients in a resource-limited and indigent setting as both the scores have NPV greater than 90%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.