ArticleCureus2021
Management of Peritonsillar Abscess Within a Local Emergency Department: A Quality Analysis Study.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peritonsillar Abscess and Post-aspiration Bleed Identified with Point-of-care Ultrasound Using Endocavitary Probe: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Analysis of Smoking Behavior in Patients With Peritonsillar Abscess: A Rural Community Hospital's Experience.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePeritonsillar abscess (PTA) is the most common deep space infection of the head and neck, affecting thousands of people annually with high treatment costs. The purpose of this project was to determine how in-network emergency departments (EDs) adhere to generally accepted guidelines regarding diagnosis and management of potential PTAs.
methodsThe authors performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients with PTA in five EDs in one year. Information pertaining to diagnostic tests, treatment, and airway status was also collected. Descriptive analysis was used to assess if EDs were consistent with generally accepted guidelines.
resultsSix hundred twenty-one patient records were identified and 140 were included in final analysis. Out of 140 patients, 71 were admitted for inpatient management and 23 were admitted for observation. Of the 46 patients diagnosed and discharged from the ED, 61% received a computerized tomography (CT) scan and only 39% had PTA drainage performed. Four (3%) patients received a point of care ultrasound and a CT scan and no patient received only an ultrasound. Out of all patients, 116/140 received a CT scan and 22 received drainage in the ED. The remainder of these patients either had drainage performed by an otolaryngologist or had no drainage performed. Of the 94 patients admitted for inpatient or observation, 84 received a CT scan and six received drainage by an ED physician. Only 62% of patients were given a penicillin derivative and 29% were given clindamycin, which has no Gram-negative coverage.
conclusionOne-third of PTA patients were managed within the ED, far less than similar studies. Of these, over 50% received a CT scan and less than 50% had PTA drainage. PTA drainage can improve patients' symptoms and antibiotic effectiveness. The majority of patients were prescribed a penicillin derivative with or without another antibiotic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.