ArticleCureus2021
Prediction of Recurrence Risk in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Single-Institution Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm With Aberrant CD31 Expression: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.Cureus · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological and molecular features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms: a retrospective series including a small subset of aggressive cases.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Insights into Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Single Center Experience of 64 Surgical Cases.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Prediction of solid pseudopapillary tumor invasiveness of the pancreas based on multiphase contrast-enhanced CT radiomics nomogram.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Ruptured solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in children: a 20-year single-center experience.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm of pancreas in pregnancy: A case report and review of literature.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- Preoperative prediction of invasive behavior of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm by MRI-based multiparametric radiomics models.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas with Lymph Node Metastasis in a Young Male Patient.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a low-grade malignant neoplasm with unpredictable behavior. Factors associated with recurrence were not conclusively identified. The aim of this study is to define the clinicopathological criteria for recurrence risk prediction in SPNs based on the most recent scientific evidence and to present our experience with SPNs.
methodsA retrospective review of patients with SPNs operated on in our institution from June 2012 to June 2018 was completed. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. A detailed literature review was performed to evaluate the factors associated with the recurrence of SPNs.
resultsThe cohort consisted of 13 female patients with a median age of 24 years and a mean tumor size of 7.7 cm. Body and tail (53.8%) were the most common location, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy was the prevalent surgical procedure. One patient of SPN operated on for local recurrence after 11 years which had high-grade malignant histological features on the previously resected tumor. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 36 to 108), all patients were disease free and alive. The proposed criteria for predicting recurrence in SPNs include tumor size >8 cm, synchronous metastasis, malignant SPN (according to 2000 or 2010 World Health Organization [WHO] criteria), lymphovascular invasion, pancreatic parenchymal invasion, and high Ki-67 index (>4%). All these are worse prognostic factors and should be considered as high-risk factors for postoperative relapse.
conclusionThe above-mentioned criteria can better predict SPN recurrence. Patients with high-risk features should undergo an extended follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.