ArticleCureus2021
Laparoscopic Excision of Patent Processus Vaginalis for Pediatric Hydroceles.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The standard surgical practice for pediatric hydrocele is resection and ligation of the patent processus vaginalis (PPV). Non-ligation of PPV for pediatric hydrocele is another possibility that can be repaired laparoscopically. Material & methods A retrospective study was undertaken over 10 years (Jan 2011-Feb 2020), of a case series of boys with hydroceles that underwent laparoscopic PPV (Lap PPV) excision. Exclusion criteria were for parents who requested open surgery (10 cases) or an omental plug noted at the PPV site during laparoscopy (one case). Laparoscopic PPV excision was performed via a transperitoneal approach. Results There were 43 cases of Lap PP excision, including three recurrences after open surgery. There were no conversions, complications, or recurrences in any patients. The average operative time for unilateral cases was 21 mins (range 15-30 mins). Three concurrent contra-lateral hydroceles were noted and resected during the primary procedure. Time to regular activity was within one day. There was no visible scar or recurrence after Lap PPV at six months post-surgery review. Conclusion Lap PPV excision appears to be at least equivalent to the "open and ligation" approach. During laparoscopy, both internal rings are assessed for a PPV. By avoiding an inguinal incision(s), a better cosmetic result is possible. It is conceivably safer than open surgery in recurrent cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.