ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
Standardization of
Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Silent Threat in Post-Tuberculosis Patients: Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis Survey in Multiple Regions of Indonesia (I-CHROME Study).Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the LDBio ICT IgG/IgM lateral flow assay versus the Bordier Elisa assay for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in Nigeria.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Early identification of hepatocellular carcinoma patients at high-risk of recurrence using the ADV score: a multicenter retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Fungal diseases in Africa: epidemiologic, diagnostic and therapeutic advances.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesCommercial
methodsSera from 519 prospectively recruited healthy blood donors and 39 previously confirmed cases of CPA were analysed for
resultsAmong healthy blood donors, 141 (27.2%) were aged 16-25 years with median (interquartile range, IQR) of 22 (20-24) years; 304 (58.6%) were aged 26-40 years with median (IQR) of 32 (29-36) years; while 74 (14.2%) were aged 41-60 years with median (IQR) of 46 (44-49.75). Median IgG level in respective age groups were 0.069 (0.009-0.181), 0.044 (0.014-0.202) and 0.056 (0.01-0.265) with no significant difference found in the three age categories (
conclusionThe optimal diagnostic cutoff for diagnosing CPA in Nigerians using the Bordier kit was 0.821 which is lower than the manufacturer's recommended cutoff of 1.0. The determination of this cutoff among Nigerians will significantly enhance accurate identification of CPA and assessment of its true burden in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.