ArticleEcology and evolution2021
BASE: A novel workflow to integrate nonubiquitous genes in comparative genomics analyses for selection.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Convergent relaxation of molecular constraint in herbivores reveals the changing role of liver and kidney functions across mammalian diets.Genome research · 2024Article
- Signatures of Extreme Longevity: A Perspective from Bivalve Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- AlexandrusPS: A User-Friendly Pipeline for the Automated Detection of Orthologous Gene Clusters and Subsequent Positive Selection Analysis.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Gene transcriptional profiles in gonads of Bacillus taxa (Phasmida) with different cytological mechanisms of automictic parthenogenesis.Zoological letters · 2022Article
- BASE: A novel workflow to integrate nonubiquitous genes in comparative genomics analyses for selection.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferring the selective forces that orthologous genes underwent across different lineages can help us understand the evolutionary processes that have shaped their extant diversity and the phenotypes they underlie. The most widespread metric to estimate the selection regimes of coding genes-across sites and phylogenies-is the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (d
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.