Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645926›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2022

Venetoclax and azacitidine followed by allogeneic transplant results in excellent outcomes and may improve outcomes versus maintenance therapy among newly diagnosed AML patients older than 60.

Daniel A Pollyea, Amanda Winters, Christine McMahon, Marc Schwartz, Craig T Jordan, Rachel Rabinovitch, Diana Abbott, Clayton A Smith, Jonathan A Gutman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mutation- and MRD-informed treatments for transplant-ineligible patients.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Precision medicine in AML: overcoming resistance.International journal of hematology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel A PollyeaDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Amanda WintersDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Christine McMahonDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Marc SchwartzDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Craig T JordanDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0869-3465
Rachel RabinovitchDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Diana AbbottDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Clayton A SmithDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Jonathan A GutmanDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, USA. jonathan.gutman@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1470-0716
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of venetoclax (ven) and azacitidine (aza) has resulted in high response rates in the upfront treatment of AML in patients age > 75 and patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Given the poor historical outcomes in patients age ≥ 60 treated with induction chemotherapy, ven/aza has become our institutional preference for the initial treatment of non-core binding factor (CBF) AML patients age ≥ 60. The benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) in patients who achieve response to ven/aza is uncertain. We report outcomes of SCT-eligible patients treated at our center. Between 1/2015 and 1/2020, 119 newly diagnosed non-CBF AML patients age ≥ 60 received ven/aza as initial therapy. 21 patients underwent SCT; 31 additional patients were potentially SCT eligible but deferred SCT. Overall survival (OS) was significantly greater among SCT patients (median survival not reached) versus potentially SCT eligible patients not undergoing SCT (median 518 days) (p = 0.01). Our data suggest that ven/aza followed by SCT in newly diagnosed AML patients older than ≥ 60 results in excellent outcomes and likely improves outcomes over maintenance therapy. Ongoing investigation will further refine the optimal timing of and selection of patients for SCT based on prognostic disease features and response assessments.

Indexed as

AzacitidineLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAllograftsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHumansRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesAzacitidineBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID34645926
OpenAlexW3206139187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.