Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645892›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2021

Levosimendan versus dobutamine for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dong-Hua Liu, Yi-Le Ning, Yan-Yan Lei, Jing Chen, Yan-Yan Liu, Xin-Feng Lin, Zhong-Qi Yang, Shao-Xiang Xian, Wei-Tao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Association Between Myocardial Dysfunction and Septic Shock.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Hemodynamic Support in Sepsis.Anesthesiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Septic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Hua Liu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
Yi-Le Ning *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
Yan-Yan LeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
Yan-Yan LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
Xin-Feng LinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhong-Qi YangLing-Nan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 12, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China. yang_zhongqi@163.com.
Shao-Xiang XianLing-Nan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 12, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China. zhongyfy@126.com.
Wei-Tao ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 16, Jichang Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong Province, China. chenweitao1900@gzucm.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levosimendan and dobutamine are extensively used to treat sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure in ICU. Nevertheless, the role and mechanism of levosimendan in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Moreover, previous studies on whether levosimendan is superior to dobutamine are still controversial. More importantly, these studies did not take changes (before-after comparison to the baseline) in quantitative parameters such as ejection fraction into account with the baseline level. Here, we aimed to determine the pros and cons of the two medicines by assessing the changes in cardiac function and blood lactate, mortality, with the standardized mean difference used as a summary statistic. Relevant studies were obtained by a thorough and disciplined literature search in several notable academic databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase until November 2020. Outcomes included changes in cardiac function, lactic acid, mortality and length of hospital stay. A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in this study, including 192 patients. Compared with dobutamine, patients treated with levosimendan had a greater improvement of cardiac index (ΔCI) (random effects, SMD = 0.90 [0.20,1.60]; I

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesSepsisDisease-Free SurvivalDobutamineLactic AcidSimendanStroke VolumeSurvival RateDobutamineLactic AcidSimendan

Identifiers

PMID34645892
PMCPMC8514594
OpenAlexW3205099924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.