ArticleScientific reports2021
Genetic propensity for obesity, socioeconomic position, and trajectories of body mass index in older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social factors contributing to the development of chronic low back pain: a scoping review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Impact of socioeconomic status on obesity in older adults: the suppressive effect of social support and sleep quality.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic Status and Obesity.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Review
- Gene-environment interactions and the case of body mass index and obesity: How much do they matter?PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Polygenic and socioeconomic risk for high body mass index: 69 years of follow-up across life.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying how socioeconomic positioning and genetic factors interact in the development of obesity is imperative for population-level obesity prevention strategies. The current study investigated whether social positioning, either independently or through interaction with a polygenic score for Body Mass Index (BMI-PGS), influences BMI trajectories across older adulthood. Data were analysed from 7,183 individuals from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA). Interactions between the BMI-PGS and; lower educational attainment, self-perceived social status (SSS), and income, on BMI trajectories over 12 years across older adulthood were investigated through linear mixed effects models. Lower educational attainment, SSS and income were each associated with a higher baseline BMI for women, but not for men. There were interaction effects between BMI-PGS and social positioning such that men aged > 65 with a lower educational attainment (β = 0.62; 95%CI 0.00 - 1.24, p < 0.05), men aged ≤ 65 of a lower income (β = - 0.72, 95%CI - 1.21 - - 0.23, p < 0.01) and women aged ≤ 65 of lower SSS (β = - 1.41; 95%CI - 2.46 - 0.36, p < 0.01) showed stronger associations between the BMI-PGS and baseline BMI. There were few associations between markers of socioeconomic position and rate of change in BMI over the follow-up period. In sum, lower socioeconomic positioning showed adverse associations with women's BMI in older adulthood. Moreover, the expression of the BMI-PGS, or extent to which it translates to a higher BMI, was subtly influenced by socioeconomic standing in both women and in men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.