Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645493›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2021

DNA methylation-based profiling reveals distinct clusters with survival heterogeneity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Jieyu Wang, Jun Li, Ruifang Chen, Huiran Yue, Wenzhi Li, Beibei Wu, Yang Bai, Guohua Zhu, Xin Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BeyondmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  8. Overview of Tumor Heterogeneity in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jieyu WangDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Ruifang ChenDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Huiran YueDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Wenzhi LiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Beibei WuDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Yang BaiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Guohua ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Xin LuDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, No. 128, Shenyang Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200090, China. xinludoc@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-9549
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

national natural science foundation of china 81802596national natural science foundation of china 82002748National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072877natural science foundation of shanghai 20ZR1408900Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 17ZR1403500science and technology commission of shanghai municipality 19YF1404300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common type of epigenetically heterogeneous ovarian cancer. Methylation typing has previously been used in many tumour types but not in HGSOC. Methylation typing in HGSOC may promote the development of personalized care. The present study used DNA methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and identified four unique methylation subtypes of HGSOC. With the poorest prognosis and high frequency of residual tumours, cluster 4 featured hypermethylation of a panel of genes, which indicates that demethylation agents may be tested in this group and that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be used to reduce the possibility of residual lesions. Cluster 1 and cluster 2 were significantly associated with metastasis genes and metabolic disorders, respectively. Two feature CpG sites, cg24673765 and cg25574024, were obtained through Cox proportional hazards model analysis of the CpG sites. Based on the methylation level of the two CpG sites, the samples were classified into high- and low-risk groups to identify the prognostic information. Similar results were obtained in the validation set. Taken together, these results explain the epigenetic heterogeneity of HGSOC and provide guidance to clinicians for the prognosis of HGSOC based on DNA methylation sites.

Indexed as

AgedCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsDNA profilingHigh-grade serous ovarian cancerMethylation subtypesOvarian cancerPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34645493
PMCPMC8515755
OpenAlexW3207527684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.