Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645478›Full record

SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Motor function in type 2 and 3 SMA patients treated with Nusinersen: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Giorgia Coratti, Costanza Cutrona, Maria Carmela Pera, Francesca Bovis, Marta Ponzano, Fabrizia Chieppa, Laura Antonaci, Valeria Sansone, Richard Finkel, Marika Pane and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spinal muscular atrophy: Biology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic advances.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics reveals predictive biomarkers of nusinersen therapy efficacy in type II and type III spinal muscular atrophy patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Giorgia Coratti *Pediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Costanza Cutrona *Pediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Maria Carmela Pera *Pediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Francesca BovisBiostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marta PonzanoBiostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Fabrizia ChieppaPediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Laura AntonaciPediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Valeria SansoneNeurorehabilitation Unit, Neuromuscular Omnicentre Clinical Center, Niguarda Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Richard FinkelSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, USA.
Marika PanePediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Eugenio MercuriPediatric Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. eugeniomaria.mercuri@unicatt.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-5365
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing number of papers reporting the real world use of Nusinersen in different cohorts of SMA patients. MAIN BODY: The aim of this paper was to critically review the literature reporting real world data on motor function in type 2 and 3 patients treated with Nusinersen, subdividing the results according to SMA type, age and type of assessment and performing a meta-analysis of the available results. We also report the available data collected in untreated patients using the same measures. Of the 400 papers identified searching for Nusinersen and spinal muscular atrophy, 19 reported motor function in types 2 and 3: 13 in adults, 4 in children and 2 included both. Twelve papers reported untreated patients' data. All studies reported positive changes on at least one of the functional measures and at every time point while all-untreated cohorts showed negative changes.

conclusionOur review suggests that Nusinersen provides a favorable benefit in motor function across a wide range of SMA type 2 and 3 patients over a 10-14 month observation period. Although a direct comparison with studies reporting data from untreated patients cannot be made, the longitudinal changes in the treated cohorts (consistently positive) are divergent from those observed in the untreated cohorts (consistently negative). The difference could be observed both in the global cohorts and in smaller groups subdivided according to age, type or functional status.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalSpinal Muscular Atrophies of ChildhoodChildHumansOligonucleotidesnusinersenOligonucleotidesCritical reviewNusinersenSpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID34645478
PMCPMC8515709
OpenAlexW3206999035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.