Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645413›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results.

Deborah Cragun, Jason Beckstead, Meagan Farmer, Gillian Hooker, Marleah Dean, Ellen Matloff, Sonya Reid, Ann Tezak, Anne Weidner, Jennifer G Whisenant and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04763915 (Improving Care After Inherited Cancer Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04763915 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Improving Care After Inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterRan2022 to 2028Enrolled720ConditionsInherited Cancer Syndrome, Prostate Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Endometrial CancerArmsCorrelative Studies (Survey), Correlative Studies (Interview), GeneSHARE, LivingLabReport, Standard-of-care & Adaptive Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deborah CragunCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, IDRB 304, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Jason BecksteadCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, IDRB 304, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Meagan FarmerMy Gene Counsel, PO Box 612, Branford, CT, 06405, USA.
Gillian HookerVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Marleah DeanDepartment of Communication, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CIS 3043, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Ellen MatloffMy Gene Counsel, PO Box 612, Branford, CT, 06405, USA.
Sonya ReidVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Ann TezakVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Anne WeidnerVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Jennifer G WhisenantVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Tuya PalVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA. tuya.pal@vumc.org.

Funding

TISSUE CoreP50CA098131 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARK, BEN HO, PIETENPOL, JENNIFER A · 2003 to 2024
$48.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Tuya Pal, Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
IMProving Care After Inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) StudyU01CA254832 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CRAGUN, DEBORAH LE, PAL, TUYA · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000445NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098131NCI NIH HHS U01 CA254832NCI NIH HHS U01CA254832NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition into routine clinical care offers a tremendous opportunity for cancer prevention and early detection. However, genetic testing itself does not improve outcomes; rather, outcomes depend on implemented follow-up care. The IMPACT study is a hybrid type I randomized effectiveness-implementation trial to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions for individuals with inherited cancer predisposition focused on: 1) increasing family communication (FC) of genetic test results; and 2) improving engagement with guideline-based cancer risk management (CRM).

methodsThis prospective study will recruit a racially, geographically, and socioeconomically diverse population of individuals with a documented pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in an inherited cancer gene. Eligible participants will be asked to complete an initial trial survey and randomly assigned to one of three arms: A) GeneSHARE, a website designed to increase FC of genetic test results; B) My Gene Counsel's Living Lab Report, a digital tool designed to improve understanding of genetic test results and next steps, including CRM guidelines; or C) a control arm in which participants continue receiving standard care. Follow-up surveys will be conducted at 1, 3, and 12 months following randomization. These surveys include single-item measures, scales, and indices related to: 1) FC and CRM behaviors and behavioral factors following the COM-B theoretical framework (i.e., capability, opportunity, and motivation); 2) implementation outcomes (i.e., acceptability, appropriateness, exposure, and reach); and 3) other contextual factors (i.e., sociodemographic and clinical factors, and uncertainty, distress, and positive aspects of genetic test results). The primary outcomes are an increase in FC of genetic test results (Arm A) and improved engagement with guideline-based CRM without overtreatment or undertreatment (Arm B) by the 12-month follow-up survey. DISCUSSION: Our interventions are designed to shift the paradigm by which individuals with P/LP variants in inherited cancer genes are provided with information to enhance FC of genetic test results and engagement with guideline-based CRM. The information gathered through evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of these real-world approaches is needed to modify and scale up adaptive, stepped interventions that have the potential to maximize FC and CRM.

trial registrationThis study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04763915, date registered: February 21, 2021). PROTOCOL VERSION: September 17th, 2021 Amendment Number 04.

Indexed as

CommunicationGenetic TestingTruth DisclosureAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleNeoplasmsNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskBRCACancer risksClinical trialFamily communicationGenetic testingGuideline adherenceHereditary cancerLynch syndromeManagementPersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID34645413
PMCPMC8513202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.