Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645399›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccinations: a cross-sectional community survey in Bangladesh.

Md Saiful Islam, Abu Bakkar Siddique, Rejina Akter, Rafia Tasnim, Md Safaet Hossain Sujan, Paul R Ward, Md Tajuddin Sikder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Saiful IslamDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh. islam.msaiful@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-2423
Abu Bakkar SiddiqueDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-8281
Rejina AkterDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3562-9004
Rafia TasnimDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0103-5435
Md Safaet Hossain SujanDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0313-2423
Paul R WardCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5559-9714
Md Tajuddin SikderDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh. sikder@juniv.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-2263
Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies · BDFlinders University · AUJahangirnagar University · BDSave the Children · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral vaccines have been approved for use against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and distributed globally in different regions. However, general community knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccinations are poorly understood. Thus, the study aimed to investigate community knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccinations in Bangladesh.

methodsAn exploratory and anonymous population-based e-survey was conducted among 1658 general individuals (55.6% male; mean age = 23.17 ± 6.05 years; age range = 18-65 years). The survey was conducted using a semi-structured and self-reported questionnaire containing informed consent along with four sections (i.e., socio-demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions). Multiple linear regression was performed to determine the variables predicting knowledge, and attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccinations.

resultsThe mean scores of knowledge and attitudes were 2.83 ± 1.48 (out of 5) and 9.34 ± 2.39 (out of 12) respectively. About a quarter of participants thought that the COVID-19 vaccination available in Bangladesh is safe, only 60% will have the vaccination and about two-thirds will recommend it to family and friends. In the multiple regression model, higher SES, having university/ higher levels of education, having nuclear families and having previous history of essential vaccines uptake were associated with knowledge; whilst attitudes were significantly associated with being female and having previous history of essential vaccines uptake. Just over half of the participants thought that everyone should be vaccinated and 61% responded that health workers should be vaccinated first on priority basis. 95% of respondents believed the vaccine should be administered free of charge in Bangladesh and almost 90% believed that the COVID-19 vaccine used in Bangladesh may have side effects.

conclusionsThe findings reflect inadequate knowledge but more positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine among the general population in Bangladesh. In order to improve knowledge, immediate health education programs need to be initiated before mass vaccination are scheduled.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAttitudesCOVID-19KnowledgePerceptionsSide effectVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34645399
PMCPMC8513387
OpenAlexW3205678096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.