Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645395›Full record

Observational studyBMC psychiatry2021

Benign ethnic neutropenia: an analysis of prevalence, timing and identification accuracy in two large inner-city NHS hospitals.

Ebenezer Oloyede, Olubanke Dzahini, Nigel Barnes, Aleksandar Mijovic, Shreyans Gandhi, Sara Stuart-Smith, Theo de Witte, David Taylor, Eromona Whiskey

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genetic identification of undiagnosed benign ethnic neutropenia in patients receiving clozapine treatment.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ebenezer OloyedePharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Ebenezer.oloyede@slam.nhs.uk.
Olubanke DzahiniPharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nigel BarnesPharmacy Department, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Aleksandar MijovicKings College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Shreyans GandhiKings College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sara Stuart-SmithKings College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Theo de WitteRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
David Taylor *Pharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Eromona Whiskey *Pharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College London · GBBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenign ethnic neutropenia (BEN) is the most common cause of chronic neutropenia seen in individuals of African, Middle Eastern and West Indian descent. This phenotype is broadly defined by an absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) below 1.8 × 10

methodsThis was an observational, retrospective analysis of patients registered with clozapine haematological monitoring systems in two large mental health trusts, chosen because they serve an ethnically diverse population. The first objective was to establish certified BEN prevalence in current users of clozapine. The second objective was to explore the stage of treatment at which BEN was identified. The third objective was to evaluate the extent of unrecognised BEN in patients registered on the Central Non-Rechallenge Database (CNRD), a database for patients whose haematological parameters fall below set thresholds when receiving clozapine treatment, meaning they cannot ordinarily be prescribed clozapine again.

resultsThe study population comprised of 2020 patients on the clozapine register. 111 patients were monitored under BEN criteria. BEN was mostly identified after a below threshold haematological result or clozapine rechallenge (68%) compared to at clozapine initiation (32%). Eight of the 18 (42%) black patients registered on the CNRD were classified as BEN after assessment by a haematologist. Of these 8 patients, none would have met CNRD criteria again if monitored with BEN criteria at clozapine initiation.

conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that BEN remains an uncommonly recognised haematological phenotype. Improved timely identification of BEN will reduce unnecessary interruption or discontinuation of clozapine treatment. Our results suggest consideration should also be given to determining BEN status prior to initiating clozapine. Moreover, adoption of current FDA BEN monitoring criteria in the UK may further reduce clozapine discontinuation due to perceived neutropenia as drug toxicity, particularly in treatment-refractory schizophrenia patients.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineNeutropeniaHospitalsHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesState MedicineAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineBenign ethnic neutropeniaClozapineCNRD

Identifiers

PMID34645395
PMCPMC8515765
OpenAlexW3205406861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.