Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34645288›Full record

ArticleBioanalysis2021

Rapid development of analytical methods for evaluating pandemic vaccines: a COVID-19 perspective.

Jeremy Baldwin, Sakshi Piplani, Isaac G Sakala, Yoshikazu Honda-Okubo, Lei Li, Nikolai Petrovsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioanalysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluating the efficacy and safety of SpikoGen®, an Advax-CpG55.2-adjuvanted severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein vaccine: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Trial
  3. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy BaldwinVaxine Pty Ltd, 11 Walkley Avenue, Adelaide, 5046, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-8939
Sakshi PiplaniVaxine Pty Ltd, 11 Walkley Avenue, Adelaide, 5046, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4740-4972
Isaac G SakalaVaxine Pty Ltd, 11 Walkley Avenue, Adelaide, 5046, Australia.
Yoshikazu Honda-OkuboVaxine Pty Ltd, 11 Walkley Avenue, Adelaide, 5046, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-8621
Lei LiVaxine Pty Ltd, 11 Walkley Avenue, Adelaide, 5046, Australia.
Nikolai PetrovskyVaxine Pty Ltd, 11 Walkley Avenue, Adelaide, 5046, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-5245
Flinders University · AUVaxine (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are key in charting a path out of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, development of new vaccines is highly dependent on availability of analytical methods for their design and evaluation. This paper highlights the challenges presented in having to rapidly develop vaccine analytical tools during an ongoing pandemic, including the need to address progressive virus mutation and adaptation which can render initial assays unreliable or redundant. It also discusses the potential of new computational modeling techniques to model and analyze key viral proteins and their attributes to assist vaccine production and assay design. It then reviews the current range of analytical tools available for COVID-19 vaccine application, ranging from

Indexed as

PandemicsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccinesanalytical toolsCOVID-19pandemicpreclinical modelsSARS-CoV-2vaccine designviruses

Identifiers

PMID34645288
PMCPMC8516068
OpenAlexW3205067728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.