ArticleCancer research and treatment2022
Next-generation Proteomics-Based Discovery, Verification, and Validation of Urine Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoantibody-Based Models for the Diagnosis and Activity Assessment of Takayasu Arteritis.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- From cell lines to the clinic: identifying a urinary BlCa-EV signature through comparative proteomics of bladder cancer lysates and extracellular vesicles.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- The promise of deep urine proteomics for diagnosis of cancer, neurologic, and metabolic diseases.PloS one · 2026Article
- Progress in the application of combined detection of urinary tumor DNA and exosomes in the classification, staging, and clinical management of bladder cancer: a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- LC-MS-Based Metabolomics and Proteomics Sample Preparation of Urine: Methods and Multi-Omics Integration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Intervention of machine learning in bladder cancer research using multi-omics datasets: systematic review on biomarker identification.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- A novel machine learning algorithm selects proteome signature to specifically identify cancer exosomes.eLife · 2024Article
- Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Take It or Leave It?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Construction of noninvasive prognostic model of bladder cancer patients based on urine proteomics and screening of natural compounds.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Next-generation proteomics of serum extracellular vesicles combined with single-cell RNA sequencing identifies MACROH2A1 associated with refractory COVID-19.Inflammation and regeneration · 2022Article
- A Liquid Biopsy in Bladder Cancer-The Current Landscape in Urinary Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to identify, verify, and validate a multiplex urinary biomarker-based prediction model for diagnosis and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma of bladder, using high-throughput proteomics methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsLabel-free quantification of data-dependent and data-independent acquisition of 12 and 24 individuals was performed in each of the discovery and verification phases using mass spectrometry, simultaneously using urinary exosome and proteins. Based on five scoring system based on proteomics data and statistical methods, we selected eight proteins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on urine from 120 patients with bladder mass lesions used for validation. Using multivariable logistic regression, we selected final candidate models for predicting bladder cancer.
resultsComparing the discovery and verification cohorts, 38% (50/132 exosomal differentially expressed proteins [DEPs]) and 44% (109/248 urinary DEPs) are consistent at statistically significance, respectively. The 20 out of 50 exosome proteins and 27 out of 109 urinary proteins were upregulated in cancer patients. From eight selected proteins, we developed two diagnostic models for bladder cancer. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of two models were 0.845 and 0.842, which outperformed AUROC of urine cytology.
conclusionThe results showed that the two diagnostic models developed here were more accurate than urine cytology. We successfully developed and validated a multiplex urinary protein-based prediction, which will have wide applications for the rapid diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. External validation for this biomarker panel in large population is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.